The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"According to Bloom 2007, p. 232, alternate" Should this say, "According to Ken Bloom, alternate..." With the reference given as a footnote at the end of the sentence?
My initial thought was that it was unnecessary to cite "Bloom 2007, p. 232" as a footnote, because it's already in the explanatory note. Upon further thought, it turns out that the rest of the explanatory note ("However, contemporary media refer to the Forbes-Robertson reception being on September 29 and the first show on October 2.") did not have inline footnotes, which I just added now. For consistency, I moved Bloom to a footnote.
Epicgenius (
talk)
13:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)reply
" and was known as the "third Shubert", -> " and was known "as the third Shubert" to align with what is quoted in ref 69
The reason I quoted only the words "third Shubert" is that I'm quoting the phrase used to describe Cohen, rather than the book itself. The words "as the" are technically also in the source, but this is a common phrase.
Epicgenius (
talk)
12:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)reply
There are no footnotes pointing to "Henderson, Mary C. (2004)." Should this be removed from the sources section, and perhaps moved to a "Further reading" section?
My concerns have been addressed, and I will promote this to GA. Please ping me if you have any questions or concerns.
Z1720 (
talk)
18:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"According to Bloom 2007, p. 232, alternate" Should this say, "According to Ken Bloom, alternate..." With the reference given as a footnote at the end of the sentence?
My initial thought was that it was unnecessary to cite "Bloom 2007, p. 232" as a footnote, because it's already in the explanatory note. Upon further thought, it turns out that the rest of the explanatory note ("However, contemporary media refer to the Forbes-Robertson reception being on September 29 and the first show on October 2.") did not have inline footnotes, which I just added now. For consistency, I moved Bloom to a footnote.
Epicgenius (
talk)
13:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)reply
" and was known as the "third Shubert", -> " and was known "as the third Shubert" to align with what is quoted in ref 69
The reason I quoted only the words "third Shubert" is that I'm quoting the phrase used to describe Cohen, rather than the book itself. The words "as the" are technically also in the source, but this is a common phrase.
Epicgenius (
talk)
12:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)reply
There are no footnotes pointing to "Henderson, Mary C. (2004)." Should this be removed from the sources section, and perhaps moved to a "Further reading" section?
My concerns have been addressed, and I will promote this to GA. Please ping me if you have any questions or concerns.
Z1720 (
talk)
18:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.