This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. India: Uttar Pradesh Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in August 2021. Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I am suggesting the article Naimisha Forest be merged into this article for the following reasons:

• These articles refer to the same piligrimage spot.It is useless to maintain more than one article for the same topic.
• The content of Naimisha Forest is merely a collection of Puranic legends about that piligrimage spot,which could be put into a new section on this article,with appropriate references.

Guru-45 ( talk) 18:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC) reply

These are two different entities - one is a temple, other is a forest. We can look at renaming Naimisarnyam article, if need be. Check in here. Ssriram mt ( talk) 22:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC) reply

But couldn't we merge them,and add a section on the forest?Check this link,for example.People usally talk about the forest, along with the temple. Guru-45 ( talk) 02:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC) reply

It is true that the legends are closely associated, but in modern times, they are widely different. I will expand the article based on some sources, which I have got recently. It will definitely clear some air. Ssriram mt ( talk) 11:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC) reply

You mean,when we say "Naimisaranyam" we immediately think--The divya desam,while when we say "Naimisha forest",we think just about the forest?In that case,wouldn't it be a good idea to at least link the articles together then? Guru-45 ( talk) 12:04, 25 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Definitely - i have got references and content - will improve it over the weekend. Ssriram mt ( talk) 14:14, 25 May 2013 (UTC) reply

It has been expanded, please let me know if the discussion can be closed. Ssriram mt ( talk) 00:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Yes. Guru-45 ( talk) 08:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC) reply

নৈমিষারণ্য 2402:3A80:1F6B:9EC5:0:0:D95:5109 ( talk) 15:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Kaha jata hai naivisananya me 22 lac risiyo ne tap kiya tha. 103.15.254.53 ( talk) 10:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply