This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shinn v. Ramirez article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article follows the
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the
Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at:
Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to
Supreme Court cases and the
Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article has not yet received a rating on the
importance scale.
Precedents
Why is the term "precedent" mentioned nowhere in the current version of this article, when one of the most notable things about this ruling is its near-wholesale overturning of precedents set in multiple previous Supreme Court cases?
173.88.246.138 (
talk)
00:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shinn v. Ramirez article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article follows the
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the
Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at:
Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to
Supreme Court cases and the
Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article has not yet received a rating on the
importance scale.
Precedents
Why is the term "precedent" mentioned nowhere in the current version of this article, when one of the most notable things about this ruling is its near-wholesale overturning of precedents set in multiple previous Supreme Court cases?
173.88.246.138 (
talk)
00:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply