If "Kingsley" was a legitimate alt name, perhaps should be in bold and add a redirect to here.
"was renamed to its present name" bit clunky repetitive.
Can you link level crossing?
"Two car parks with 47 bays in total are on either side of the station" always find this awkward, do you mean "There is a car park on both sides of the station, with a total of 47 bays"?
Instead of "large" for gap, perhaps be explicit, source says 130mm I think.
"the same year the adjacent Challis station opened" -> "as did the adjacent Challis station".
"The station was originally named Kingsley station" repetitive.
"due to Kingsley in the northern suburbs of Perth causing confusion." -> "to avoid confusion with Kingsley in the northern suburbs of Perth".
No more up-to-date info on boardings than 13/14?
Sadly no. Figures are only ever released on an ad hoc basis.
If "Kingsley" was a legitimate alt name, perhaps should be in bold and add a redirect to here.
"was renamed to its present name" bit clunky repetitive.
Can you link level crossing?
"Two car parks with 47 bays in total are on either side of the station" always find this awkward, do you mean "There is a car park on both sides of the station, with a total of 47 bays"?
Instead of "large" for gap, perhaps be explicit, source says 130mm I think.
"the same year the adjacent Challis station opened" -> "as did the adjacent Challis station".
"The station was originally named Kingsley station" repetitive.
"due to Kingsley in the northern suburbs of Perth causing confusion." -> "to avoid confusion with Kingsley in the northern suburbs of Perth".
No more up-to-date info on boardings than 13/14?
Sadly no. Figures are only ever released on an ad hoc basis.