The contents of the Sherman Antitrust Act (federal preemption) page were merged into Sherman Antitrust Act on 10 January 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 2, 2013 and July 2, 2022. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Unfortunately, the other page is hard to read and may be viewed as being of low quality. Some cleanup would be required, but that page should probably be a section of this page. 2602:306:311F:13B0:20E2:AAA5:A8EF:1D0 ( talk) 16:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
'Support' Agree per nom. JLo-Watson ( talk) 00:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Support, other page definitely looks like a needlessly separated section of this article. Biglulu ( talk) 07:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) -- Vaulter 18:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 →
Sherman Antitrust Act – The "of 1890" isn't necessary for disambiguation, and removing it would make the title more
WP:CONCISE. The shorter version also appears to be substantially more common in reliable sources. This would revert an undiscussed 2018 move.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just added a source for this small section. Specifically, I cited The Oxford Encyclopedia of American Business, Labor, and Economic History. I also added an in-line citation and a few quotation marks for phrases that appeared in the source I found and that would be harder or more confusing to re-phrase using my own words.-- NoFace23 ( talk) 07:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
The contents of the Sherman Antitrust Act (federal preemption) page were merged into Sherman Antitrust Act on 10 January 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 2, 2013 and July 2, 2022. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Unfortunately, the other page is hard to read and may be viewed as being of low quality. Some cleanup would be required, but that page should probably be a section of this page. 2602:306:311F:13B0:20E2:AAA5:A8EF:1D0 ( talk) 16:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
'Support' Agree per nom. JLo-Watson ( talk) 00:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Support, other page definitely looks like a needlessly separated section of this article. Biglulu ( talk) 07:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) -- Vaulter 18:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 →
Sherman Antitrust Act – The "of 1890" isn't necessary for disambiguation, and removing it would make the title more
WP:CONCISE. The shorter version also appears to be substantially more common in reliable sources. This would revert an undiscussed 2018 move.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just added a source for this small section. Specifically, I cited The Oxford Encyclopedia of American Business, Labor, and Economic History. I also added an in-line citation and a few quotation marks for phrases that appeared in the source I found and that would be harder or more confusing to re-phrase using my own words.-- NoFace23 ( talk) 07:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)