This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Because the Sacred Harp is better known, the article would benefit from a list of "distinctives", but thus far no third party source has provided a list. Anecdotally, the following may be mentioned:
Americans are experts at gushing over a living tradition when they are tourists in a foreign land, but rarely notice when it happens right beneath their noses (Mark 6:4). Vagabond nanoda ( talk) 01:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your new article on "Shenandoah Harmony". Note that other editors have called for more evidence of notability. The article currently has some robust sources but they tend to be about people associated with the Shenandoah Harmony project, or similar books, but not necessarily about this book itself. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the article..
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 20:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
I believe that the notability concern has been addressed. The concern seems to have been about the sources. While some of the sources cited do indeed constitute "trivial" mentions of the topic, Davis dedicates an entire chapter of his doctoral dissertation to the Shenandoah Harmony. This is remarkable, especially given the fact that the dissertation was completed in 2016, only three years after the initial publication of Shenandoah Harmony. Davis identifies Shenandoah Harmony as the most impactful and widely-used four-shape tunebook of the modern era. Davis's scholarly attention itself attests to the significance of the topic, and surely anticipates further scholarly engagement. I therefore suggest that the notability standard has been met, and I propose to remove the notability template in four weeks if there is no objection. -- Esmoell ( talk) 16:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
As no objections were raised in response to my September 5 announcement that I intended to remove the notability template, I have removed the notability template. -- Esmoell ( talk) 14:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Because the Sacred Harp is better known, the article would benefit from a list of "distinctives", but thus far no third party source has provided a list. Anecdotally, the following may be mentioned:
Americans are experts at gushing over a living tradition when they are tourists in a foreign land, but rarely notice when it happens right beneath their noses (Mark 6:4). Vagabond nanoda ( talk) 01:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your new article on "Shenandoah Harmony". Note that other editors have called for more evidence of notability. The article currently has some robust sources but they tend to be about people associated with the Shenandoah Harmony project, or similar books, but not necessarily about this book itself. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the article..
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 20:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
I believe that the notability concern has been addressed. The concern seems to have been about the sources. While some of the sources cited do indeed constitute "trivial" mentions of the topic, Davis dedicates an entire chapter of his doctoral dissertation to the Shenandoah Harmony. This is remarkable, especially given the fact that the dissertation was completed in 2016, only three years after the initial publication of Shenandoah Harmony. Davis identifies Shenandoah Harmony as the most impactful and widely-used four-shape tunebook of the modern era. Davis's scholarly attention itself attests to the significance of the topic, and surely anticipates further scholarly engagement. I therefore suggest that the notability standard has been met, and I propose to remove the notability template in four weeks if there is no objection. -- Esmoell ( talk) 16:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
As no objections were raised in response to my September 5 announcement that I intended to remove the notability template, I have removed the notability template. -- Esmoell ( talk) 14:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)