This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shell (computing) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Operating system shell page were merged into Shell (computing) on May 31, 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
What would be really cool would be if someone found out why a Shell is called "shell". Does it have sth. to do with real ocean shells? I found nothing about that in the net yet.--Darkstar
The claims that "The design of a shell is guided by cognitive ergonomics and the goal is to achieve the best workflow" were introduced in 2014 but without citations to support them. As I remarked in my comment to my requests for citations, I don't think Thompson, Ritchie, Bourne or Joy were thinking about cognitive ergonomics and best workflow when they invented their shells. I think they were simply trying to create the thinnest possible layers between the user and operating system. Msnicki ( talk) 12:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Or child process or Spawn (computing) ? — Jerome Potts ( talk) 10:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Appsoft4 This section focuses on mainly one shell in specific, cites few sources, and generally doesn't present a neutral POV, so I have removed it. Feel free to rewrite the section or contest this TappyTurtle ( talk • contribs) 03:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shell (computing) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Operating system shell page were merged into Shell (computing) on May 31, 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
What would be really cool would be if someone found out why a Shell is called "shell". Does it have sth. to do with real ocean shells? I found nothing about that in the net yet.--Darkstar
The claims that "The design of a shell is guided by cognitive ergonomics and the goal is to achieve the best workflow" were introduced in 2014 but without citations to support them. As I remarked in my comment to my requests for citations, I don't think Thompson, Ritchie, Bourne or Joy were thinking about cognitive ergonomics and best workflow when they invented their shells. I think they were simply trying to create the thinnest possible layers between the user and operating system. Msnicki ( talk) 12:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Or child process or Spawn (computing) ? — Jerome Potts ( talk) 10:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Appsoft4 This section focuses on mainly one shell in specific, cites few sources, and generally doesn't present a neutral POV, so I have removed it. Feel free to rewrite the section or contest this TappyTurtle ( talk • contribs) 03:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)