This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, I've made some changes by taking away some sentences I felt were not neutral. Is the tone better? Let me know. Thanks. Psstpnoy 07:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
This is the founder of LibraryThing, a competitor. I have refrained from changing the following part:
I feel that it might be better to contextualize this. I am the person cited, but my company is a competitor with them. While I criticized them for this, for spamming and for astroturfing--for which they apologized--and generally have a low opinion of their tactics, I don't think it's fair to say that they have been criticized without noting the source is hardly impartial.
I would either find someone impartial who said this, put something in about the partiality of the source or remove it.
Oh, blech. Wikipedia chose wrong! :) -- Lectiodifficilior ( talk) 21:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey. This is the LibraryThing guy again. Clearly I can't edit this article, but I wanted to drop a line suggesting someone do it. The current version is too thin, IMHO, and the criticism section—which I think belongs—shouldn't be the only section! That's unfair, I think. There should be something on their features, including one or two sentences on their "shelf" feature—which they stress more than other sites. Lectiodifficilior ( talk) 16:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Do you think the screen shot should be updated? The site looks different now... —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlicexCullen ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I removed the POV tag because the specific reasons it was added appear to have been addressed. If anyone still thinks there is a remaining POV issue, please insert a new tag with a new date and explain why here. If anyone thinks the existing POV issue was not addressed, please insert the old tag with the old date and explain why here. Thanks! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 17:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, I've made some changes by taking away some sentences I felt were not neutral. Is the tone better? Let me know. Thanks. Psstpnoy 07:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
This is the founder of LibraryThing, a competitor. I have refrained from changing the following part:
I feel that it might be better to contextualize this. I am the person cited, but my company is a competitor with them. While I criticized them for this, for spamming and for astroturfing--for which they apologized--and generally have a low opinion of their tactics, I don't think it's fair to say that they have been criticized without noting the source is hardly impartial.
I would either find someone impartial who said this, put something in about the partiality of the source or remove it.
Oh, blech. Wikipedia chose wrong! :) -- Lectiodifficilior ( talk) 21:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey. This is the LibraryThing guy again. Clearly I can't edit this article, but I wanted to drop a line suggesting someone do it. The current version is too thin, IMHO, and the criticism section—which I think belongs—shouldn't be the only section! That's unfair, I think. There should be something on their features, including one or two sentences on their "shelf" feature—which they stress more than other sites. Lectiodifficilior ( talk) 16:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Do you think the screen shot should be updated? The site looks different now... —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlicexCullen ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I removed the POV tag because the specific reasons it was added appear to have been addressed. If anyone still thinks there is a remaining POV issue, please insert a new tag with a new date and explain why here. If anyone thinks the existing POV issue was not addressed, please insert the old tag with the old date and explain why here. Thanks! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 17:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC)