This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a
stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Slow down. By reading the sources in Hevrew this does not look like nonsense. I am checking it out with rockets expert.
Chagai22:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Absolute True
I checked the sources, and all the information is accurate and backed by reliable sources. It is based on the following books in Hebrew:
רפא"ל - בניבי המחקר והפיתוח לביטחון ישראל, מאת מוניה מרדור, משרד הביטחון, ההוצאה לאור, ת"א, 1980, ע"ע 319-348
מעל האופק - 50 שנות פעילות ישראלית בחלל, מאת דני שלום, באויר פרסומי תעופה, ת"א, 2003, ע"ע 12-15
Above the Horizon, 50 years of Israel's Space Activity, by Dani Shalom, BaAvir flight publishing, 2003, pages 12-15.
Therefore, I am taking all citation needed out. I am still not sure regarding the picture - continue checking.
Chagai10:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)reply
References need to be in the article. I can't add them because I don't speak the language (Hebrew?), please can someone who does check and add them. --GW_SimulationsUser Page |
Talk20:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I found a couple of references
[1][2] that seem to indicate this rocket was real (you have to scroll up slightly on the second one) - so I have removed the prod. Cheers
TigerShark (
talk)
23:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)reply
It is ashame you did not bother to look at the refrences I already posted above before you proposed a deletion. I added it to the article.
Chagai (
talk)
14:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Shavit-2 is the follow-on, more advanced, but probably still classified (because it is based on the top-secret newest, longer-range version of the Jericho missile, probably an IRBM or even ICBM:
http://hashmonean.com/2010/08/18/star-wars-israel-charts-ambitious-space-plans/. And while Israel does not need a long-range ICBM to reach Iran, the same missile can be configured to carry a heavier payload on a shorter distance, maybe MIRVs, because the throw-weight is bigger) version of Shavit-1. The references clearly provide false information, or maybe even worse, are conceived for the sole purpose of misleading. After all, Mossad is quite effective in guarding the strategic secrets of Israel. The article with this name should describe a relatively new, heavier launcher, that launched the latest Ofeq satellites (just google Shavit 2, or Jericho III or Israel ICBM), and not some old sounding rocket. Otherwise, it should be deleted--
Arado (
talk)
19:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a
stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Slow down. By reading the sources in Hevrew this does not look like nonsense. I am checking it out with rockets expert.
Chagai22:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Absolute True
I checked the sources, and all the information is accurate and backed by reliable sources. It is based on the following books in Hebrew:
רפא"ל - בניבי המחקר והפיתוח לביטחון ישראל, מאת מוניה מרדור, משרד הביטחון, ההוצאה לאור, ת"א, 1980, ע"ע 319-348
מעל האופק - 50 שנות פעילות ישראלית בחלל, מאת דני שלום, באויר פרסומי תעופה, ת"א, 2003, ע"ע 12-15
Above the Horizon, 50 years of Israel's Space Activity, by Dani Shalom, BaAvir flight publishing, 2003, pages 12-15.
Therefore, I am taking all citation needed out. I am still not sure regarding the picture - continue checking.
Chagai10:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)reply
References need to be in the article. I can't add them because I don't speak the language (Hebrew?), please can someone who does check and add them. --GW_SimulationsUser Page |
Talk20:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I found a couple of references
[1][2] that seem to indicate this rocket was real (you have to scroll up slightly on the second one) - so I have removed the prod. Cheers
TigerShark (
talk)
23:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)reply
It is ashame you did not bother to look at the refrences I already posted above before you proposed a deletion. I added it to the article.
Chagai (
talk)
14:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Shavit-2 is the follow-on, more advanced, but probably still classified (because it is based on the top-secret newest, longer-range version of the Jericho missile, probably an IRBM or even ICBM:
http://hashmonean.com/2010/08/18/star-wars-israel-charts-ambitious-space-plans/. And while Israel does not need a long-range ICBM to reach Iran, the same missile can be configured to carry a heavier payload on a shorter distance, maybe MIRVs, because the throw-weight is bigger) version of Shavit-1. The references clearly provide false information, or maybe even worse, are conceived for the sole purpose of misleading. After all, Mossad is quite effective in guarding the strategic secrets of Israel. The article with this name should describe a relatively new, heavier launcher, that launched the latest Ofeq satellites (just google Shavit 2, or Jericho III or Israel ICBM), and not some old sounding rocket. Otherwise, it should be deleted--
Arado (
talk)
19:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)reply