This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Sharon Pincott is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article reads like a publicity piece for the woman. It appears to have been almost entirely written by several similarly named
WP:SPA editors and smacks of
WP:COI. Significant cleanup is needed.
Toddst1 (
talk) 19:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
I agree. This article is crammed full of overtly promotional language and needs dramatic editing to bring it into compliance with the
neutral point of view.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 22:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Toddst1 I've been abroad and don't understand message addressed to me. I can see tho that you've made substantial deletions to the Sharon Pincott page I've inputted to in the past and you ask about conflict of interest? There isn't any conflict of interest. Why should there be? I've been assisting to keep page on specialist in a field I keep well abreast of updated with useful info. You've deleted such worthy info. You've left few references to published interviews but even deleted Forbes Africa. How many people get into Forbes magazine! There's also no mention anymore of all of the political intimidation and threats endured inside Zimbabwe which strikes me as terribly strange. Grateful please advise how I contribute to this page now although it doesn't appear conducive to updates any longer
ReaderUSA (
talk) 02:08, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Note this author and elephant specialist appears regularly in press. It hence has been easy to update with solidly referenced and hence verifiable additions in past. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ReaderUSA (
talk •
contribs) 02:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Will you not even agree to allow completely valid, significant and varifiable things like Forbes Africa reference back in? Do you call that publicity rather than factually relevant? What about political intimidation and the likes of physical assault endured at hands of government officials that was in prior?
ReaderUSA (
talk) 07:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Sharon Pincott is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article reads like a publicity piece for the woman. It appears to have been almost entirely written by several similarly named
WP:SPA editors and smacks of
WP:COI. Significant cleanup is needed.
Toddst1 (
talk) 19:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
I agree. This article is crammed full of overtly promotional language and needs dramatic editing to bring it into compliance with the
neutral point of view.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 22:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Toddst1 I've been abroad and don't understand message addressed to me. I can see tho that you've made substantial deletions to the Sharon Pincott page I've inputted to in the past and you ask about conflict of interest? There isn't any conflict of interest. Why should there be? I've been assisting to keep page on specialist in a field I keep well abreast of updated with useful info. You've deleted such worthy info. You've left few references to published interviews but even deleted Forbes Africa. How many people get into Forbes magazine! There's also no mention anymore of all of the political intimidation and threats endured inside Zimbabwe which strikes me as terribly strange. Grateful please advise how I contribute to this page now although it doesn't appear conducive to updates any longer
ReaderUSA (
talk) 02:08, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Note this author and elephant specialist appears regularly in press. It hence has been easy to update with solidly referenced and hence verifiable additions in past. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ReaderUSA (
talk •
contribs) 02:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Will you not even agree to allow completely valid, significant and varifiable things like Forbes Africa reference back in? Do you call that publicity rather than factually relevant? What about political intimidation and the likes of physical assault endured at hands of government officials that was in prior?
ReaderUSA (
talk) 07:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply