 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
I can't provide a reference at the moment, but I do know that this case has been featured on either Court TV ( Forensic Files?) or A&E ( American Justice?). I've seen it multiple times. So for what my memories are worth, I'd say this is notable, although the article right now doesn't seem to do a great job of explaining that. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi ( talk) 21:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC) - not the article's author
- There is a fair bit from a google search. I'd agree that she could be a notable person. Just need some reliable sources. Nk.sheridan Talk 21:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- I removed the speedy and the unref tag as the article has references and esablished enough notability to avoid an A7. However, the notability is problematic due to wp:blp1e. There's a strong probability that the article will get deleted through an afd. To avoid deletion, I would advise that the context of the artice be reformatted so that the subject is the event, not the person, therby avoiding any [[wp:blp1e] problems. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a transcript of her appeal in 2003 here which might be useful in reformatting the article to relate to the event rather than the person. Nk.sheridan Talk 21:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a section (in this Wikipedia article) "In popular culture" (if it didn't already exist in June 2008) which answers the questions about Forensic Files and A&E. I recently added that Forensic Files reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 ( talk) 15:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
There's a lot of case law citation in the update section that would be easier to understand if there were a little more exposition as to what was actually at issue in the related cases; perhaps some external references if the cases aren't in WP would be suitable, but at this particular point in time, there's a bunch of names thrown into the article with no explanation as to why the underlying information is relevant. Absurdist1968 ( talk) 09:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 2 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
I can't provide a reference at the moment, but I do know that this case has been featured on either Court TV ( Forensic Files?) or A&E ( American Justice?). I've seen it multiple times. So for what my memories are worth, I'd say this is notable, although the article right now doesn't seem to do a great job of explaining that. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi ( talk) 21:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC) - not the article's author
- There is a fair bit from a google search. I'd agree that she could be a notable person. Just need some reliable sources. Nk.sheridan Talk 21:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- I removed the speedy and the unref tag as the article has references and esablished enough notability to avoid an A7. However, the notability is problematic due to wp:blp1e. There's a strong probability that the article will get deleted through an afd. To avoid deletion, I would advise that the context of the artice be reformatted so that the subject is the event, not the person, therby avoiding any [[wp:blp1e] problems. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a transcript of her appeal in 2003 here which might be useful in reformatting the article to relate to the event rather than the person. Nk.sheridan Talk 21:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a section (in this Wikipedia article) "In popular culture" (if it didn't already exist in June 2008) which answers the questions about Forensic Files and A&E. I recently added that Forensic Files reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 ( talk) 15:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
There's a lot of case law citation in the update section that would be easier to understand if there were a little more exposition as to what was actually at issue in the related cases; perhaps some external references if the cases aren't in WP would be suitable, but at this particular point in time, there's a bunch of names thrown into the article with no explanation as to why the underlying information is relevant. Absurdist1968 ( talk) 09:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)