![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can we please have more input on the shared-lane versus shared lane debate happening in the edits but not here in the discussion page?-- Stevevance ( talk) 20:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Correct usage: "a shared-lane marking identifies a shared lane." The compound adjective gets a hyphen to indicate that it is the lane, not the marking, which is shared. Jsallen1 ( talk) 18:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
A page is now created for shared lane markings (so Sharrow would be spared any more extraneous content). As initially created it's very "bare-bones", so feel free to add and embellish, but please ensure that any added content is consistent with good technical guidance and accepted practice for this marking and bicycle transportation engineering in general. RCMoeur 13:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Is sharrow at portmanteau of share and arrow? or shared lane and arrow? or something else completely? 74.61.6.82 ( talk) 23:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
It would seem to me, the “sh” comes from “shared” and the “arrow” from arrow. There is nothing at all from “lane”. Wschart ( talk) 18:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Bicycle pictograms declare in Germany always bicycle lanes (exclusive for bicycles, must be used; §2(4) StVO i.e. German road code) and bicycle roads, where cars can be tolerated at low speed (max. 30km/h), but bicycles have priority of use. They do not declare shared lanes, because bicycles normally have to use the right lane (shared with cars, bikes etc.) and bicycle lanes are the special case. HC Ahlmann from Germany 81.173.152.123 ( talk) 08:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually to my knowledge this is not the case, in Germany they also depict Fahrradstrassen which are bicycle priority streets which are shared with cars. -- Sf ( talk) 20:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
As a driver of a car, there is one thing I have never seen mentioned in an explanation of sharrows: What should I do differently when I see a sharrow? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.167.236.153 ( talk) 17:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Does this mean they may/shall/should not use the full lane if there are no 'sharrow' markings ? If the marking means different things to cyclists and motorists, then that can cause conflict ! To some extent, 'may' and 'may not' are not opposites. There is a sense 'possibly' in which 'may' and 'might' are interchangeable - 'I may do it' = 'I may not do it' !
In the UK cyclists are taught 'primary position' - far from the kerb, but motorists are not taught to expect it or respect it ! It can be a problem. -- 195.137.93.171 ( talk) 22:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Over 50 locations are listed in the US, with citations for almost 20. When will we have enough places using shared use arrows that we can delete the list and just say "used in many cities across the country?" --Triskele Jim 19:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The study "Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design", [1] reached conclusions wildly contradicting other studies and is inconsistent with itself. Example: while more than half of injury-causing crashes it reported did not involve a motor vehicle, this study reported a 2000% reduction in risk where motor vehicles were excluded. See responses to the report on the study in the journal which published it. Jsallen1 ( talk) 18:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Shared lane marking. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Bicycles May Use Full Lane and Shared lane marking seem to be overlapping subjects, and could be incorporated into one article. Sauer202 ( talk) 17:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can we please have more input on the shared-lane versus shared lane debate happening in the edits but not here in the discussion page?-- Stevevance ( talk) 20:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Correct usage: "a shared-lane marking identifies a shared lane." The compound adjective gets a hyphen to indicate that it is the lane, not the marking, which is shared. Jsallen1 ( talk) 18:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
A page is now created for shared lane markings (so Sharrow would be spared any more extraneous content). As initially created it's very "bare-bones", so feel free to add and embellish, but please ensure that any added content is consistent with good technical guidance and accepted practice for this marking and bicycle transportation engineering in general. RCMoeur 13:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Is sharrow at portmanteau of share and arrow? or shared lane and arrow? or something else completely? 74.61.6.82 ( talk) 23:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
It would seem to me, the “sh” comes from “shared” and the “arrow” from arrow. There is nothing at all from “lane”. Wschart ( talk) 18:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Bicycle pictograms declare in Germany always bicycle lanes (exclusive for bicycles, must be used; §2(4) StVO i.e. German road code) and bicycle roads, where cars can be tolerated at low speed (max. 30km/h), but bicycles have priority of use. They do not declare shared lanes, because bicycles normally have to use the right lane (shared with cars, bikes etc.) and bicycle lanes are the special case. HC Ahlmann from Germany 81.173.152.123 ( talk) 08:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually to my knowledge this is not the case, in Germany they also depict Fahrradstrassen which are bicycle priority streets which are shared with cars. -- Sf ( talk) 20:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
As a driver of a car, there is one thing I have never seen mentioned in an explanation of sharrows: What should I do differently when I see a sharrow? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.167.236.153 ( talk) 17:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Does this mean they may/shall/should not use the full lane if there are no 'sharrow' markings ? If the marking means different things to cyclists and motorists, then that can cause conflict ! To some extent, 'may' and 'may not' are not opposites. There is a sense 'possibly' in which 'may' and 'might' are interchangeable - 'I may do it' = 'I may not do it' !
In the UK cyclists are taught 'primary position' - far from the kerb, but motorists are not taught to expect it or respect it ! It can be a problem. -- 195.137.93.171 ( talk) 22:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Over 50 locations are listed in the US, with citations for almost 20. When will we have enough places using shared use arrows that we can delete the list and just say "used in many cities across the country?" --Triskele Jim 19:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The study "Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design", [1] reached conclusions wildly contradicting other studies and is inconsistent with itself. Example: while more than half of injury-causing crashes it reported did not involve a motor vehicle, this study reported a 2000% reduction in risk where motor vehicles were excluded. See responses to the report on the study in the journal which published it. Jsallen1 ( talk) 18:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Shared lane marking. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Bicycles May Use Full Lane and Shared lane marking seem to be overlapping subjects, and could be incorporated into one article. Sauer202 ( talk) 17:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)