This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The lead here is off: In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. Johnjbarton ( talk) 17:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The section "Alpha particle as building block" seems to directly contradict the prolate spheroid section? Johnjbarton ( talk) 18:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The first image in the article is shown as thumbnails in many wikipedia summary pages, eg search results. Therefore the "lump of spheres" in the current article is inappropriate. For now the prolate spheroid would be better. @ Urayness Johnjbarton ( talk) 15:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure out the structure of the article.
We start with spherical approximation and then "Origins"? I'm unsure what this section means. Then "Nucleon shape" a rather long section given that it is not ultimately related to the article topic AFAICT. Then "Space between nucleons", which seems to be information on "distance between nucleons". We return to the article topic with "Soft core of light nuclides" but it's about size and density rather than shape. The alpha particle and heavy nuclides are back on track.
Perhaps if the sections were in an order that related them, their nature and reason to be would be clearer. Johnjbarton ( talk) 01:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The paper
reviews theoretical and experimental data showing that nuclei have multiple coexisting shapes analogous to but different from molecular isomers. Johnjbarton ( talk) 23:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
This edit by @ Ehrenkater of change by a registered user has no edit summary. So we have no idea why. Johnjbarton ( talk) 16:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Part of a sentence at the start of the text had been, probably accidentally, deleted by the previous editor, so that the text then started "and nuclei as outlined ...". This should have been clear from glancing at the text.--- Ehrenkater ( talk) 07:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The lead here is off: In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. Johnjbarton ( talk) 17:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The section "Alpha particle as building block" seems to directly contradict the prolate spheroid section? Johnjbarton ( talk) 18:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The first image in the article is shown as thumbnails in many wikipedia summary pages, eg search results. Therefore the "lump of spheres" in the current article is inappropriate. For now the prolate spheroid would be better. @ Urayness Johnjbarton ( talk) 15:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure out the structure of the article.
We start with spherical approximation and then "Origins"? I'm unsure what this section means. Then "Nucleon shape" a rather long section given that it is not ultimately related to the article topic AFAICT. Then "Space between nucleons", which seems to be information on "distance between nucleons". We return to the article topic with "Soft core of light nuclides" but it's about size and density rather than shape. The alpha particle and heavy nuclides are back on track.
Perhaps if the sections were in an order that related them, their nature and reason to be would be clearer. Johnjbarton ( talk) 01:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The paper
reviews theoretical and experimental data showing that nuclei have multiple coexisting shapes analogous to but different from molecular isomers. Johnjbarton ( talk) 23:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
This edit by @ Ehrenkater of change by a registered user has no edit summary. So we have no idea why. Johnjbarton ( talk) 16:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Part of a sentence at the start of the text had been, probably accidentally, deleted by the previous editor, so that the text then started "and nuclei as outlined ...". This should have been clear from glancing at the text.--- Ehrenkater ( talk) 07:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)