This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pakistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam: Mosques Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Mosques task force.

The "mosque" that had been repurposed by the Sikh forces into a powder magazine and got cannoned during the '48 siege — Cunningham's "Jami Masjid" — is inside the fort-complex proper. There is a mosque at 30.199065,71.473868 — very close to Cunningham's ruins "atop a mound" — but I am uncertain of the antiquity of the present-day structure. In contrast, the seven-domed mosque whose photograph, geo-coordinates, and architectural details adorn our article (unsure about the foundational history) is far away from the fort and, hence, is a different structure. TrangaBellam ( talk) 17:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

This confusion between the two mosques is also visible at many other usually-reliable websites. For example, 1. TrangaBellam ( talk) 18:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply