A fact from Shah Faesal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 April 2019 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Shah Faesal, the first Kashmiri to top the Indian civil services exam, has become a politician? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shah Faesal.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles India: Jammu and Kashmir / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

I have edited this article quite heavily to remove the recent additions which were unreferenced personal opinion and speculation, were inappropriate to a biography of a living person, and failed to use neutral, encyclopedic language. For further guidance, please read:

• Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
• Wikipedia:Verifiability
• Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

- Voceditenore ( talk) 17:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC) reply

...but rather his defense against others' views of him. That's not what that section is for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.241.169.80 ( talk) 13:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Shifted to controversies. DiplomatTesterMan ( talk) 16:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC) reply