![]() | Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 13, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 25 March 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Can anyone tell me what the real ending of Umer Marvi is?
According to the one I have heard, Umer sets her free.
But according to two sources on the internet, Khet disguises himself as a dervish and Marvi runs away with him.
The two sources are http://www.opf.org.pk/almanac/F/folktales.htm & http://www.usp.nus.edu.sg/post/pakistan/literature/moon/moon2.html
The wikipedia article on Umer Marvi is copied from the OPF website. But the ending has been changed to say she is set free by Umer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umar_Marvi
Please, tell me the real ending.
Image:Shah Latif.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
heer and ranjha was not at all discussed by shah abdul latif bhitai. heer and ranjha was discussed in the poetry of waris shah of panjab. those characters are not concerned with sindh and shah abdul latif bhitai. for reference shah jo risalo(the magzine of shah abdul latif's poetry) any comment on moazzam0002@yahoo.com
You are right, Bhittai never use Heer Ranjha in his poetry. Alixafar ( talk) 09:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
The subject's name is spelled "Bhita'i" in the title but consistently "Bhittai" in the article. Of course, the current spelling (presumaby a differing transliteration) can be retained as a redirect. -- MegaSloth ( talk) 01:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Bhittai is correct word, in all the articles never used the word "Bhita'i". So the title Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai is more suitable. Every one can search both the words in google.com for confirmation. Alixafar ( talk) 09:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
The keyboard, keys, and extended-ASCII codes, and the search engines you choose for searching could make a tremendous difference. And someone should consult Arabic-studies and -literature scholars at institutions with more than one PhD in those fields. Our guy-in-a-diner research methodologies can work wonders, but sometimes
fiascos(? Fiasci ?) instead.
--
Jerzy•
t
07:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Due to geocities.com closed the online poetry of Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai translated by Elsa Kazi shifted from http://geocities.com/bhittai to http://www.sindhiana.com/thebhittai/ Alixafar ( talk) 09:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Portions of this article are identical to parts of Life and Times of Shah Bhitai. The website in question doesn't mention Wikipedia, so someone should check if the Wikipedia article was created later than the website's page. -- Jashiin ( talk) 11:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Note to self, and perhaps to similarly situated colleagues: don't bother cursing the colleague who jumps in with a responding edit 20 minutes after yours, but (1) bear in mind that a bot is likely to do so bcz you left undated template calls in yr prior edit, and (2) copy and paste the summary for your new edit back onto the bottom of the new revision you tried and failed to save, then copy the new version plus the summary into your paste buffer, and (3) start a new edit session on the same article's same section, or same talk page's same section "that the 'architects' cast aside", by pasting over it with the paste buffer, to be "the new head and capstone", then cut and paste the summary portion from the edit box to the comment or reply box. If you remember, fill in the bot's summary in the edit comment box, followed by your own comment &/or retort, and hit save. Now, things aren't as bad as they seemed, are they? (And am I right, that you'll now be offered the opportunity for a closing and retorting summary? Let's see: Jerzy• t 06:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, it's called a Reply here on a article-talk page, instead of a summary. Bazinga!
Jerzy• t 06:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
I guess I lied, & I'm sorry; I think every subsequent addtion, to a tk pg secn (at least using the
Pad2 interface i) s called a reply, and I dunno whether the first edit to each talk How the first. Is solicited.
--
Jerzy•
t
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.binashah.net/women_thar.htm/TheWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
02:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by AhmadLX ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC).
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 13, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 25 March 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Can anyone tell me what the real ending of Umer Marvi is?
According to the one I have heard, Umer sets her free.
But according to two sources on the internet, Khet disguises himself as a dervish and Marvi runs away with him.
The two sources are http://www.opf.org.pk/almanac/F/folktales.htm & http://www.usp.nus.edu.sg/post/pakistan/literature/moon/moon2.html
The wikipedia article on Umer Marvi is copied from the OPF website. But the ending has been changed to say she is set free by Umer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umar_Marvi
Please, tell me the real ending.
Image:Shah Latif.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
heer and ranjha was not at all discussed by shah abdul latif bhitai. heer and ranjha was discussed in the poetry of waris shah of panjab. those characters are not concerned with sindh and shah abdul latif bhitai. for reference shah jo risalo(the magzine of shah abdul latif's poetry) any comment on moazzam0002@yahoo.com
You are right, Bhittai never use Heer Ranjha in his poetry. Alixafar ( talk) 09:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
The subject's name is spelled "Bhita'i" in the title but consistently "Bhittai" in the article. Of course, the current spelling (presumaby a differing transliteration) can be retained as a redirect. -- MegaSloth ( talk) 01:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Bhittai is correct word, in all the articles never used the word "Bhita'i". So the title Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai is more suitable. Every one can search both the words in google.com for confirmation. Alixafar ( talk) 09:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
The keyboard, keys, and extended-ASCII codes, and the search engines you choose for searching could make a tremendous difference. And someone should consult Arabic-studies and -literature scholars at institutions with more than one PhD in those fields. Our guy-in-a-diner research methodologies can work wonders, but sometimes
fiascos(? Fiasci ?) instead.
--
Jerzy•
t
07:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Due to geocities.com closed the online poetry of Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai translated by Elsa Kazi shifted from http://geocities.com/bhittai to http://www.sindhiana.com/thebhittai/ Alixafar ( talk) 09:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Portions of this article are identical to parts of Life and Times of Shah Bhitai. The website in question doesn't mention Wikipedia, so someone should check if the Wikipedia article was created later than the website's page. -- Jashiin ( talk) 11:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Note to self, and perhaps to similarly situated colleagues: don't bother cursing the colleague who jumps in with a responding edit 20 minutes after yours, but (1) bear in mind that a bot is likely to do so bcz you left undated template calls in yr prior edit, and (2) copy and paste the summary for your new edit back onto the bottom of the new revision you tried and failed to save, then copy the new version plus the summary into your paste buffer, and (3) start a new edit session on the same article's same section, or same talk page's same section "that the 'architects' cast aside", by pasting over it with the paste buffer, to be "the new head and capstone", then cut and paste the summary portion from the edit box to the comment or reply box. If you remember, fill in the bot's summary in the edit comment box, followed by your own comment &/or retort, and hit save. Now, things aren't as bad as they seemed, are they? (And am I right, that you'll now be offered the opportunity for a closing and retorting summary? Let's see: Jerzy• t 06:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, it's called a Reply here on a article-talk page, instead of a summary. Bazinga!
Jerzy• t 06:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
I guess I lied, & I'm sorry; I think every subsequent addtion, to a tk pg secn (at least using the
Pad2 interface i) s called a reply, and I dunno whether the first edit to each talk How the first. Is solicited.
--
Jerzy•
t
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.binashah.net/women_thar.htm/TheWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
02:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by AhmadLX ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC).
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)