![]() | Shag Times was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
I'm wondering if it would be better to bill this as an album by
The Justified Ancients of Mu Mu in the infobox and intro, with a note in the text that side LP 2 was credited to
The KLF? Discuss. :) --
kingboyk
17:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
(notes to self for formatting and inclusion later, from JAMS CD3:) All songs written by The Jams except Whitney (Jams, Rubican, Merrill, Isaac Hayes, Andrews, Burton, Westwood, Schifrin), Downtown (Jams/T. Hatch); Candyman (Jams/Hendrix/Wagner); Burn the Bastards (S. Stewart ???); Doctorin' (Jams/Chinn/Chapman/R Grainer/Glitter/M Leander). Production: JAMs. Engineer: Ian Richardson. Programmer: Nick Coler. Guest DJ: Cesare.
Burn The Bastards (The JAMS side, KLF 2): Dec 87. -- kingboyk 08:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
In short, the only info missing that I have available is the name of the engineer, the programmer, and the year of the remixes. Will add this shortly. Please place on hold in the meantime. Thank you! -- kingboyk 13:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for having taken the time to answer the questions and to have added some information to the article. It is truly nice to see such articles being succinct, well-written and broad. Lincher 16:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
This article is undergoing a Good Article Reassessment as part of the Good Article sweeps. Looking through the article, I had a few concerns:
I will place this reassessment on hold for one week to allow for these concerns to be addressed. If this can be completed within seven days, I will continue with an examination of the prose. If not, the article will be delisted. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() | Shag Times was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
I'm wondering if it would be better to bill this as an album by
The Justified Ancients of Mu Mu in the infobox and intro, with a note in the text that side LP 2 was credited to
The KLF? Discuss. :) --
kingboyk
17:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
(notes to self for formatting and inclusion later, from JAMS CD3:) All songs written by The Jams except Whitney (Jams, Rubican, Merrill, Isaac Hayes, Andrews, Burton, Westwood, Schifrin), Downtown (Jams/T. Hatch); Candyman (Jams/Hendrix/Wagner); Burn the Bastards (S. Stewart ???); Doctorin' (Jams/Chinn/Chapman/R Grainer/Glitter/M Leander). Production: JAMs. Engineer: Ian Richardson. Programmer: Nick Coler. Guest DJ: Cesare.
Burn The Bastards (The JAMS side, KLF 2): Dec 87. -- kingboyk 08:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
In short, the only info missing that I have available is the name of the engineer, the programmer, and the year of the remixes. Will add this shortly. Please place on hold in the meantime. Thank you! -- kingboyk 13:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for having taken the time to answer the questions and to have added some information to the article. It is truly nice to see such articles being succinct, well-written and broad. Lincher 16:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
This article is undergoing a Good Article Reassessment as part of the Good Article sweeps. Looking through the article, I had a few concerns:
I will place this reassessment on hold for one week to allow for these concerns to be addressed. If this can be completed within seven days, I will continue with an examination of the prose. If not, the article will be delisted. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)