From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

Zionists are editing this page with false information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.211.38.159 ( talk) 19:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Title

The citation for naming her a terrorist is most likely unreliable as it is an Israeli organization and may have NPOV issues. Should she be considered a "terrorist" or a "occupation resistance fighter"? Wiiformii ( talk) 18:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Dag21902190, it's good that you're using edit summaries, but when multiple other editors are reverting your preferred version, the answer is not to keep reverting again. The answer is to come into the talk page and discuss.
There is an essay at WP:FRAUDSTER that explains the argument about using crime labels to identify people better than I can in a few short sentences. As you're fairly new here, I'll point out this is an essay -- an argument by one or more editors about interpretation of policy -- and not policy itself. That means it's informational; I'm giving you the link so you can understand the argument. Basically the argument is: we need one or more reliable sources -- and in the case of a subject inside this highly contentious area, non-biased ones -- calling Abu Ghazaleh a terrorist in order for Wikipedia to call her that in WP:WikiVoice. If no unbiased RS are calling her that, we simply report what she did. Valereee ( talk) 11:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

Zionists are editing this page with false information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.211.38.159 ( talk) 19:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Title

The citation for naming her a terrorist is most likely unreliable as it is an Israeli organization and may have NPOV issues. Should she be considered a "terrorist" or a "occupation resistance fighter"? Wiiformii ( talk) 18:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Dag21902190, it's good that you're using edit summaries, but when multiple other editors are reverting your preferred version, the answer is not to keep reverting again. The answer is to come into the talk page and discuss.
There is an essay at WP:FRAUDSTER that explains the argument about using crime labels to identify people better than I can in a few short sentences. As you're fairly new here, I'll point out this is an essay -- an argument by one or more editors about interpretation of policy -- and not policy itself. That means it's informational; I'm giving you the link so you can understand the argument. Basically the argument is: we need one or more reliable sources -- and in the case of a subject inside this highly contentious area, non-biased ones -- calling Abu Ghazaleh a terrorist in order for Wikipedia to call her that in WP:WikiVoice. If no unbiased RS are calling her that, we simply report what she did. Valereee ( talk) 11:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook