From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Cessaune (
talk ·
contribs )
17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Hey, I'm going to review this article.
Cessaune
[talk]
17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Sorry I'm taking so long. Will be finished in 2-3 days.
Cessaune
[talk]
18:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Here we go. This is only the first half; the rest will be finished late tommorow (not a promise!)
1. Well-written :
the prose is clear, concise, and
understandable to an appropriately broad audience ; spelling and grammar are correct Y
Prose is good; some of the best writing I've read in a while. Rivals my
favorite article :)
it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation Y
3. Broad in its coverage :
it addresses the
main aspects of the topic Y
it stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ) Y
Covers everything in detail. There's a lot here, but it isn't too broad in its coverage.
4.
Neutral : it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each Y
Definitely seems to do so.
5. Stable : it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute Y
6. Illustrated , if possible, by media such as
images ,
video , or
audio :
media are
tagged with their
copyright statuses , and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content Y
media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions ?
The images that are currently there are good, but I think an image of an actual page would be useful, considering that this is a broad article about the most popular category of manga.
There are some issues with the citations; I've got to verify a few of them.
Cessaune
[talk]
02:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
reply