This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Seyit Çabuk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ HardMental: Please discontinue adding a link to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Corporal Seyit on the article. It does not belong there. We do not use the article namespace to advertise nominations like that. If you revert again I'm going to report you for edit warring. Please stop and discuss! Chris Troutman ( talk) 03:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Added link for a nomination page, taken this Article for Style into account: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_be_linked 'If you feel that a link does not belong in the body of an article, consider moving it to a "See also" section.' It states, so I also added a See Also section taking example from the Alexander The Great which also had some portals leading to related projects and other content. I want to point out that I made the page for the nominee but the main reason for me linking it was to promote the story for the photograph that I researched and found recently, imagining that it would create somewhat of an interest on the reader for the article. I would like to take help on the formatting of the dates, if objected It could be added after the nomination ends. I also would like to apologize for any confusions/misunderstandings that I may have caused, and sorry about my previous behaviors since I am quite short tempered but I assure you I had no malicious purpose behind my actions. Would like to thank you for reading this and your contributions on this matter and on the others are welcome. HardMental ( talk) 14:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
"Don't link to user, project, or draft pages in articles"which prohibits what you want to do. For example, I wrote an article and nominated a hook for the "Did You Know" wikiproject. The instructions for nomination include transcluding the nomination on the talk page which I did. Conversely, not only does "featured picture" not require publicizing the nomination, it certainly does not belong in the article. Readers should only be reading articles and we don't typically show them then "back office" areas of Wikipedia unless there's a maintenance issue like a merge proposal or a deletion discussion. Regardless of my reasoning, on Wikipedia we operate by consensus. You want to add a link on the article and I've reverted you. You don't have consensus so you can't add the material. You can argue all you want but that link is not going on the article. We can take this to WP:DRN or WP:AN if you cannot accept this. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
An image from this article has been nominated at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Corporal Seyit. Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
All the info I'm finding re the 240mm L35 Krupp fortress gun that Seyit Cabuk crewed on seem to give shell weights between 120 - 215kg, one specific Item mentions the Turkish guns having shell weights of 120 - 160kg. Could the 275 weight actually be lbs? 125.236.147.185 ( talk) 08:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC) Phil Nelson [1]
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Seyit Çabuk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ HardMental: Please discontinue adding a link to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Corporal Seyit on the article. It does not belong there. We do not use the article namespace to advertise nominations like that. If you revert again I'm going to report you for edit warring. Please stop and discuss! Chris Troutman ( talk) 03:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Added link for a nomination page, taken this Article for Style into account: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_be_linked 'If you feel that a link does not belong in the body of an article, consider moving it to a "See also" section.' It states, so I also added a See Also section taking example from the Alexander The Great which also had some portals leading to related projects and other content. I want to point out that I made the page for the nominee but the main reason for me linking it was to promote the story for the photograph that I researched and found recently, imagining that it would create somewhat of an interest on the reader for the article. I would like to take help on the formatting of the dates, if objected It could be added after the nomination ends. I also would like to apologize for any confusions/misunderstandings that I may have caused, and sorry about my previous behaviors since I am quite short tempered but I assure you I had no malicious purpose behind my actions. Would like to thank you for reading this and your contributions on this matter and on the others are welcome. HardMental ( talk) 14:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
"Don't link to user, project, or draft pages in articles"which prohibits what you want to do. For example, I wrote an article and nominated a hook for the "Did You Know" wikiproject. The instructions for nomination include transcluding the nomination on the talk page which I did. Conversely, not only does "featured picture" not require publicizing the nomination, it certainly does not belong in the article. Readers should only be reading articles and we don't typically show them then "back office" areas of Wikipedia unless there's a maintenance issue like a merge proposal or a deletion discussion. Regardless of my reasoning, on Wikipedia we operate by consensus. You want to add a link on the article and I've reverted you. You don't have consensus so you can't add the material. You can argue all you want but that link is not going on the article. We can take this to WP:DRN or WP:AN if you cannot accept this. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
An image from this article has been nominated at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Corporal Seyit. Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
All the info I'm finding re the 240mm L35 Krupp fortress gun that Seyit Cabuk crewed on seem to give shell weights between 120 - 215kg, one specific Item mentions the Turkish guns having shell weights of 120 - 160kg. Could the 275 weight actually be lbs? 125.236.147.185 ( talk) 08:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC) Phil Nelson [1]