This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the no sources cited text, as sources have been added both throughout the document, and at the end of it. In addition, no notes on the talk page were added as to which sections required additional sources, so I was unable to determine where these additional sources were required. If anyone has further information on this, please feel free to add it.
-- Wbd 19:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
After reading this carefully, I am still unable to figure out whether this was an offensive or a counter-offensive plan, what theatre actual land warfare was expected in, and even, despite the extreme focus on France and the UK in the article, what countries were expected to take part in the war, and whether it was expected that France would remain neutral. Hell, the article cannot even seem to decide whether it was a serious contingency plan or just a war games exercise plot to make driving around in tanks and digging ditches more entertaining. What gives?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aadieu ( talk • contribs) 02:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
The article first claims that France was not to be attacked and then that Lyon and the Pyrenees were objectives ??? 86.175.231.58 ( talk) 20:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
I have reverted the last edit for a couple reasons: the first is spelling- Trety is not an English word, and in English, we call the Warsaw Trety the Warsaw Pact. The second is the insertion of Pact after NATO- this is because in English we use "NATO" without pact afterwards. -- Wbd ( talk) 14:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
I see some secondary journalism around the time the plan was made public but I can't seem to find any actual links to the primary documents (in Polish or in English). Is there any actual documentation of this plan? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.250.87.252 ( talk) 17:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
A couple of reasons are given why the plans did not show nuclear attacks on the UK. Yet the article goes on to say that "though a nuclear strike would be far more effective (and, as the plans show, a preferable option for the Soviet leadership as shown by their strikes in Western Europe)". This is not correct. A plan to use nuclear weapons in Europe does not suggest a preference to use them in the UK - the plans actually suggest quite the opposite. 122.59.167.152 ( talk) 09:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
The Commanders and leaders list is incomplete. NATO leaders include Jimmy Carter, and are not limited to him. 101.98.74.13 ( talk) 06:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
A Cold War Scenario without nuclear attacks to Moscou and without participation of National Peoples Army of the GDR - how true it could be? -- Conakry ( talk) 13:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC) ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Conakry)
The lede says 1979, but one of the primary sources of this plan was dated 1964: [1] Unless there are multiple plans being confused into one, or simply a note of a 1979 map taken to mean that it was developed in 1979, rather than in force for decades. SilverbackNet talk 19:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the no sources cited text, as sources have been added both throughout the document, and at the end of it. In addition, no notes on the talk page were added as to which sections required additional sources, so I was unable to determine where these additional sources were required. If anyone has further information on this, please feel free to add it.
-- Wbd 19:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
After reading this carefully, I am still unable to figure out whether this was an offensive or a counter-offensive plan, what theatre actual land warfare was expected in, and even, despite the extreme focus on France and the UK in the article, what countries were expected to take part in the war, and whether it was expected that France would remain neutral. Hell, the article cannot even seem to decide whether it was a serious contingency plan or just a war games exercise plot to make driving around in tanks and digging ditches more entertaining. What gives?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aadieu ( talk • contribs) 02:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
The article first claims that France was not to be attacked and then that Lyon and the Pyrenees were objectives ??? 86.175.231.58 ( talk) 20:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
I have reverted the last edit for a couple reasons: the first is spelling- Trety is not an English word, and in English, we call the Warsaw Trety the Warsaw Pact. The second is the insertion of Pact after NATO- this is because in English we use "NATO" without pact afterwards. -- Wbd ( talk) 14:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
I see some secondary journalism around the time the plan was made public but I can't seem to find any actual links to the primary documents (in Polish or in English). Is there any actual documentation of this plan? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.250.87.252 ( talk) 17:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
A couple of reasons are given why the plans did not show nuclear attacks on the UK. Yet the article goes on to say that "though a nuclear strike would be far more effective (and, as the plans show, a preferable option for the Soviet leadership as shown by their strikes in Western Europe)". This is not correct. A plan to use nuclear weapons in Europe does not suggest a preference to use them in the UK - the plans actually suggest quite the opposite. 122.59.167.152 ( talk) 09:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
The Commanders and leaders list is incomplete. NATO leaders include Jimmy Carter, and are not limited to him. 101.98.74.13 ( talk) 06:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
A Cold War Scenario without nuclear attacks to Moscou and without participation of National Peoples Army of the GDR - how true it could be? -- Conakry ( talk) 13:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC) ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Conakry)
The lede says 1979, but one of the primary sources of this plan was dated 1964: [1] Unless there are multiple plans being confused into one, or simply a note of a 1979 map taken to mean that it was developed in 1979, rather than in force for decades. SilverbackNet talk 19:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)