GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs)
03:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Christine (Figureskatingfan) (
talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
03:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for
WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for
WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for
WP:WTW:
Check for
WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
![]() Check for
WP:RS:
|
![]() Check for inline citations
WP:MINREF:
|
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() (Thorough check on Google in parallel with criteria 2. Cross-checked with the other FAs – Format of Sesame Street, History of Sesame Street, Sesame Street & Sesame Street research)
|
b.
Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD) (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Christine, please feel free to strike out any recommendation from this review which you think will not help in improving the article, which is our main aim here. All the best,
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
10:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
20:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs)
03:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Christine (Figureskatingfan) (
talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
03:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for
WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for
WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for
WP:WTW:
Check for
WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
![]() Check for
WP:RS:
|
![]() Check for inline citations
WP:MINREF:
|
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() (Thorough check on Google in parallel with criteria 2. Cross-checked with the other FAs – Format of Sesame Street, History of Sesame Street, Sesame Street & Sesame Street research)
|
b.
Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD) (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Christine, please feel free to strike out any recommendation from this review which you think will not help in improving the article, which is our main aim here. All the best,
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
10:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
20:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)