This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
The statement that "there can be no 'agreement' between third parties; these agreements are simply 'contracts'" is nonsense. First, any parties can have an agreement. Second, the very definition of "contract" is an agreement between two or more parties.
Although this sentence as given is clearly wrong, I have not stricken or rewritten it because I don't know the author's intention. Perhaps there is a valid point about SLA's that the author was trying to make, but phrased it wrong. I have marked the sentence with a "citation needed" flag for now, but someone who knows more than I about SLA's and third parties should either correct or delete this sentence. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ScribeMonk (
talk •
contribs) 18:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
The statement that "there can be no 'agreement' between third parties; these agreements are simply 'contracts'" is nonsense. First, any parties can have an agreement. Second, the very definition of "contract" is an agreement between two or more parties.
Although this sentence as given is clearly wrong, I have not stricken or rewritten it because I don't know the author's intention. Perhaps there is a valid point about SLA's that the author was trying to make, but phrased it wrong. I have marked the sentence with a "citation needed" flag for now, but someone who knows more than I about SLA's and third parties should either correct or delete this sentence. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ScribeMonk (
talk •
contribs) 18:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)reply