From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 ( talk00:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Created by DigitalIceAge ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC). reply

  • The page is well referenced besides being long and new enough. The original hook is just more hooky and interesting. However the prose has a long section on history and no more. Do you think at least one more section can be added? I know this is not something to hold the nomination, just meant to suggest for improvement. -- Mhhossein talk 11:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC) reply
Thank you very much for the review and feedback, @ Mhhossein:! I have sectioned up the article some and expanded the Products section to make it a less dull read. DigitalIceAge ( talk) 02:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply
You're welcome DigitalIceAge. The page is so much better now, thank you. Let's go with the original hook, wish you a lot of hits. -- Mhhossein talk 06:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 ( talk00:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Created by DigitalIceAge ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC). reply

  • The page is well referenced besides being long and new enough. The original hook is just more hooky and interesting. However the prose has a long section on history and no more. Do you think at least one more section can be added? I know this is not something to hold the nomination, just meant to suggest for improvement. -- Mhhossein talk 11:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC) reply
Thank you very much for the review and feedback, @ Mhhossein:! I have sectioned up the article some and expanded the Products section to make it a less dull read. DigitalIceAge ( talk) 02:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply
You're welcome DigitalIceAge. The page is so much better now, thank you. Let's go with the original hook, wish you a lot of hits. -- Mhhossein talk 06:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook