This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: European / Roman & Byzantine / Spanish / Classical This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force Roman and Byzantine military history task force Spanish military history task force Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD) Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list Spain Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. European history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sertorian War be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sertorian War be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Portugal may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sertorian War be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Spain may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I'm pretty sure there where no Spaniards back then. Spain and Portugal only came several centuries later. "Celtiberian tribes" would be more correct, but I'm not sure. I am pretty sure "Spaniards" is definitely incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.99.55 ( talk) 17:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Sertorius was backed by both Lusitanians and Celtiberians -Hispanics perhaps? Dejvid ( talk) 18:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Neither Hispanics nor Spaniards. Celtiberians is the best term to use.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 01:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply

It was the Lusitanians who initially invited Sertorius to Hispania. Celtiberian support only came later. A term is needed that covers both groups. Hence Cetliberian is in correct except in cases where Celtiberians were exclusively involved. Dejvid ( talk) 12:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I also think that saying Spaniards does not make sense in the context. Hispani would be the proper term.-- Xareu bs ( talk) 08:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Most historians seem happy with Spaniards but I would not object to Hispanics or Hispani. It does seem to to be a little jargonish so I myself don't intend to make such a change. Dejvid ( talk) 17:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Noguera, Jaume; Valdés, Pau; Ble, Eduard (2022). "New perspectives on the Sertorian War in northeastern Hispania: archaeological surveys of the Roman camps of the lower River Ebro" (PDF). Journal of Roman Archaeology. 35 (1): 1–32. doi: 10.1017/S1047759422000010. ISSN  1047-7594. Ifly6 ( talk) 19:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Because the article is open access, I suppose the map can also be uploaded with attribution? Ifly6 ( talk) 19:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Konrad "A new chronology of the Sertorian war" Athenaeum 83 (1995) pp 157ff seems now to be the standard chronology, per Brennan PRR (2000) p 504 the careful recent work of Konrad on the chronology – and indeed all other aspects – of the Sertorian War has made extended discussion of many previously thorny problems unnecessary. Brennan however objects to Konrad's years (77–73) and prefers 76–72 on the basis that the senate was unlikely to have prorogued the consuls that long. Ibid pp 504–5. Ifly6 ( talk) 21:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply