![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
This text added at the end of the page detracts from the otherwise NPOV quality of the article: -- fredericknoronha 15:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Ultra left? They are totally opposite of that, I'd label them as an far right party. Sideshow Bob 17:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Serbian radical party is a pro-russian party with ties to Vladimir Zhirinovsky but also to fascists like Le Pen(France).-- (GriffinSB) ( talk) 00:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The Serbian Radical Party is in no way fascist, nor neofascist for that part. See, you can't just make an eticett with fascist written on it, and then put it on the forehead on someone. Because the SRS has nothing in its party program that in any way can link it to a fascistic ideology. They are not opposett to democracy, and they are not for kollektivisam in any shape or form for that matter. You might as well say that de Gaulle was a fascist, because if anyone is nationalistic it sertainly doesen't mean that he is fascistic.
So untill someone comes up with anything that underlines that the SRS truely is a fascist paarty, I say we should remove it from the article, and not spread lied information om Wikipedia.
Updates are needed for the 2008 Serbian presidential elections and the issue of Kosovo's status after Feb. 17, 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.9.199 ( talk) 13:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone please explain to me what ultra-nationalist means and how it is different from nationalist, other than it being propaganda used to make the party in question sound more extremist? Ultra-nationalist even links to the wikipedia page on nationalism, so what is ultra-nationalism? Thank you. -- 24.226.31.126 ( talk) 23:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok since there is no response I am changing it to nationalist as it should be. -- 139.57.226.49 ( talk) 15:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
i see that "nationalist" has been changed back to "ultra-nationalist" with a washington post article as a reference [1]. can someone confirm that the article is not readable because of an advertisement blocking the right part of the text? as i am not able to see the whole text in firefox nor in chrome. AkaiHoshi ( talk) 19:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Vojislav Seselj, modern creator of "VELIKA SRBIJA" "GREAT SERBIA" explains the concept of this ideology in his trial which can be viewed on this link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4117946890055070617# and as far as linguistics is concerned; the entire West have a common misconception as to the name of this ideology: Great Britain, in Serbian is "Velika Britanija", Great Serbia is "Velika Srbija". Using the term "Greater" is in effect propaganda implying EXPANSIVE/IMPERIALIST tendencies of the ideology. The ideology is based on informing Serbian populations of Muslim, Catholic, Protestant and Athiest religions that they are Serbs who under pressure through hundreds of years of Ottoman/Austro-Hungarian and Vatican influence have either forced or enticed them to convert religion, and then further capitalised upon that by either forcing/enticing them to identify themselves on the basis of their religion as different nationalities. Religion does not change nationality. That is the core, basic focus of the concept of "Velika Srbija". Watch that video and understand that Velika Srbija is NOT an expansive ideology, looking to "invade" or "ethnically cleanse" other nationalities but to nationaly ENLIGHTEN them and prove to those Serbs of different religions that foreigners made them falsely identify themselves. I'll be making more fixes but for the time being the name of this article and throught the article MUST be changed to Great Serbia, not "Greater" Serbia. Watch the video. Australianhistorian ( talk) 19:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lihaas ( talk) 02:09, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't see the relevance of this section with the rest of the article. There's no relation between the SRS and the People's Radical Party, besides the similar name. If there are no objections, I will remove this section. Buttons ( talk) 17:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Is there a reliable source for the allegation that the SRP is "far right"? It may be, I have no idea. Though it cannot be both "conservative" and "far right", as these are diametrically opposed ideologies. 203.80.61.102 ( talk) 04:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Serbian Radical Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Should the Serbian Radical Party be described as "right-wing to far-right" or "far-right"? -- Vacant0 ( talk) 17:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Sources for far-right: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
This text added at the end of the page detracts from the otherwise NPOV quality of the article: -- fredericknoronha 15:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Ultra left? They are totally opposite of that, I'd label them as an far right party. Sideshow Bob 17:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Serbian radical party is a pro-russian party with ties to Vladimir Zhirinovsky but also to fascists like Le Pen(France).-- (GriffinSB) ( talk) 00:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The Serbian Radical Party is in no way fascist, nor neofascist for that part. See, you can't just make an eticett with fascist written on it, and then put it on the forehead on someone. Because the SRS has nothing in its party program that in any way can link it to a fascistic ideology. They are not opposett to democracy, and they are not for kollektivisam in any shape or form for that matter. You might as well say that de Gaulle was a fascist, because if anyone is nationalistic it sertainly doesen't mean that he is fascistic.
So untill someone comes up with anything that underlines that the SRS truely is a fascist paarty, I say we should remove it from the article, and not spread lied information om Wikipedia.
Updates are needed for the 2008 Serbian presidential elections and the issue of Kosovo's status after Feb. 17, 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.9.199 ( talk) 13:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone please explain to me what ultra-nationalist means and how it is different from nationalist, other than it being propaganda used to make the party in question sound more extremist? Ultra-nationalist even links to the wikipedia page on nationalism, so what is ultra-nationalism? Thank you. -- 24.226.31.126 ( talk) 23:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok since there is no response I am changing it to nationalist as it should be. -- 139.57.226.49 ( talk) 15:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
i see that "nationalist" has been changed back to "ultra-nationalist" with a washington post article as a reference [1]. can someone confirm that the article is not readable because of an advertisement blocking the right part of the text? as i am not able to see the whole text in firefox nor in chrome. AkaiHoshi ( talk) 19:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Vojislav Seselj, modern creator of "VELIKA SRBIJA" "GREAT SERBIA" explains the concept of this ideology in his trial which can be viewed on this link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4117946890055070617# and as far as linguistics is concerned; the entire West have a common misconception as to the name of this ideology: Great Britain, in Serbian is "Velika Britanija", Great Serbia is "Velika Srbija". Using the term "Greater" is in effect propaganda implying EXPANSIVE/IMPERIALIST tendencies of the ideology. The ideology is based on informing Serbian populations of Muslim, Catholic, Protestant and Athiest religions that they are Serbs who under pressure through hundreds of years of Ottoman/Austro-Hungarian and Vatican influence have either forced or enticed them to convert religion, and then further capitalised upon that by either forcing/enticing them to identify themselves on the basis of their religion as different nationalities. Religion does not change nationality. That is the core, basic focus of the concept of "Velika Srbija". Watch that video and understand that Velika Srbija is NOT an expansive ideology, looking to "invade" or "ethnically cleanse" other nationalities but to nationaly ENLIGHTEN them and prove to those Serbs of different religions that foreigners made them falsely identify themselves. I'll be making more fixes but for the time being the name of this article and throught the article MUST be changed to Great Serbia, not "Greater" Serbia. Watch the video. Australianhistorian ( talk) 19:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lihaas ( talk) 02:09, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't see the relevance of this section with the rest of the article. There's no relation between the SRS and the People's Radical Party, besides the similar name. If there are no objections, I will remove this section. Buttons ( talk) 17:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Is there a reliable source for the allegation that the SRP is "far right"? It may be, I have no idea. Though it cannot be both "conservative" and "far right", as these are diametrically opposed ideologies. 203.80.61.102 ( talk) 04:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Serbian Radical Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Should the Serbian Radical Party be described as "right-wing to far-right" or "far-right"? -- Vacant0 ( talk) 17:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Sources for far-right: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)