This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I believe that between the third and the fifth paragraphs, the discussion of the subject focuses a little too much on the United States Senate (or rather, the senate as it exists in the United States). To use the U.S. Senate as an illustrative example is understandable, but I believe it went from an almost unavoidable referrence to overkill. Perhaps it would be the case of toning this down a little and so make it a more general article? I mean, there already is an specific article for the U.S. Senate. Redux 14:21, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
As a Scot myself, I still don't see why Senator of the College of Justice warrants disambiguation when countless other uses of senate/senator don't. Have I missed something? Fourohfour 11:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
This entire paragraph is incorrect. The Supreme Court did not rule that the Senates of the states must be proportional. They ruled that district lines must be redrawn after every census to give each district a roughly equal number of people living inside them. I promise that there is a difference. While their ruling did affect Senate seats, the major impact of their decisions is seen in House seats (both state and federal). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.209.211.170 ( talk) 00:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC). See you do not understand the porols that the Governors,Senators and the Mayors all mso the president have different jobs but are similar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.87.123.30 ( talk) 23:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I think Scots eat bad food and smell like sheep
Does Ecuador come under any of the groups, now that it will have a constitutional assembly? Farazars 06:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
What if we have an overlapping situation, i.e. a Senate was abolished both in favor of a unicameral system and a new constitution? -- PaxEquilibrium 19:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Why is the reference section in the middle of the page? 24.18.182.201 ( talk) 20:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I just added NZ to the countries with abolished senates. I know it was called the "Legislative Council", but it was a senate within the scope of this article. JimBreen ( talk) 23:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Never mind, I figured it out. Agradman ( talk) 19:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Am I missing something? This page seems to deal only with the political sense of the word. What about university senates, where are they? Flapdragon ( talk) 23:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Should we not move Fiji to the 'defunct' section? (see Senate (Fiji) and 2013 Constitution of Fiji) ---- Bancki ( talk) 10:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Ecuador did have a Senate once, at least as of the late 19th century (see: "Ecuador: A Handbook"); I believe it was abolished sometime in the 20th century. Does anyone have any more information? Josh ( talk) 18:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I am the senate 109.155.87.125 ( talk) 09:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
69.89.102.189 ( talk) 11:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Not done: it's unclear what changes you want made. ProgrammingGeek talktome 13:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Senate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I believe that between the third and the fifth paragraphs, the discussion of the subject focuses a little too much on the United States Senate (or rather, the senate as it exists in the United States). To use the U.S. Senate as an illustrative example is understandable, but I believe it went from an almost unavoidable referrence to overkill. Perhaps it would be the case of toning this down a little and so make it a more general article? I mean, there already is an specific article for the U.S. Senate. Redux 14:21, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
As a Scot myself, I still don't see why Senator of the College of Justice warrants disambiguation when countless other uses of senate/senator don't. Have I missed something? Fourohfour 11:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
This entire paragraph is incorrect. The Supreme Court did not rule that the Senates of the states must be proportional. They ruled that district lines must be redrawn after every census to give each district a roughly equal number of people living inside them. I promise that there is a difference. While their ruling did affect Senate seats, the major impact of their decisions is seen in House seats (both state and federal). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.209.211.170 ( talk) 00:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC). See you do not understand the porols that the Governors,Senators and the Mayors all mso the president have different jobs but are similar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.87.123.30 ( talk) 23:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I think Scots eat bad food and smell like sheep
Does Ecuador come under any of the groups, now that it will have a constitutional assembly? Farazars 06:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
What if we have an overlapping situation, i.e. a Senate was abolished both in favor of a unicameral system and a new constitution? -- PaxEquilibrium 19:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Why is the reference section in the middle of the page? 24.18.182.201 ( talk) 20:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I just added NZ to the countries with abolished senates. I know it was called the "Legislative Council", but it was a senate within the scope of this article. JimBreen ( talk) 23:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Never mind, I figured it out. Agradman ( talk) 19:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Am I missing something? This page seems to deal only with the political sense of the word. What about university senates, where are they? Flapdragon ( talk) 23:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Should we not move Fiji to the 'defunct' section? (see Senate (Fiji) and 2013 Constitution of Fiji) ---- Bancki ( talk) 10:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Ecuador did have a Senate once, at least as of the late 19th century (see: "Ecuador: A Handbook"); I believe it was abolished sometime in the 20th century. Does anyone have any more information? Josh ( talk) 18:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I am the senate 109.155.87.125 ( talk) 09:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
69.89.102.189 ( talk) 11:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Not done: it's unclear what changes you want made. ProgrammingGeek talktome 13:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Senate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)