The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
That Kahlo called Trotsky "El Viejo" is not supported by the citation which follows it, but I did find a
Smithsonian Magazine article which supports this. I'm a little worried that the current wording of the sentence could give rise to
WP:SYNTH issues by perhaps giving the impression that "El Viejo" was insult; maybe something like Calling Trotsky "The Old Man" (El Viejo), Kahlo was attracted to his...?
Fixed The Smithsonian source is also cited in the sentence. -
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
That's about it – I enjoyed reading the article and its sources, and it's a fine piece of work. Once these small issues are addressed, I can pass the article. --
Dylan620 (he/him •
talk •
edits) 20:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dylan620 Hey there! I'm just a random passerby editor going around helping GANs here and there and have contributed to this one. I tried to resolve all the above issues to the best of my abilities so feel free to let me know if there are further issues. -
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
APK Also notifying you so that you are up to date on this.
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 02:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
APK: I assume the first ping was meant to be for
Dcdiehardfan? Indeed, very cool of you DCDHF to do that :) Most of your fixes work quite well – you did miss one of the contractions I was referring to, but honestly it's such a small thing that I can take care of it myself after I hit "publish changes". (For what it's worth, I'd only meant that the contractions should have been expanded, i.e. she's → she is.) My next edit will be to touch up what little else needs to be taken care of; the one after that will involve passing the article. Congratulations, APK! --
Dylan620 (he/him •
talk •
edits) 01:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dylan620 Thank you! And that was my bad haha, but either way, I'm glad that the article has passed! Congrats @
APK!
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 03:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
That Kahlo called Trotsky "El Viejo" is not supported by the citation which follows it, but I did find a
Smithsonian Magazine article which supports this. I'm a little worried that the current wording of the sentence could give rise to
WP:SYNTH issues by perhaps giving the impression that "El Viejo" was insult; maybe something like Calling Trotsky "The Old Man" (El Viejo), Kahlo was attracted to his...?
Fixed The Smithsonian source is also cited in the sentence. -
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
That's about it – I enjoyed reading the article and its sources, and it's a fine piece of work. Once these small issues are addressed, I can pass the article. --
Dylan620 (he/him •
talk •
edits) 20:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dylan620 Hey there! I'm just a random passerby editor going around helping GANs here and there and have contributed to this one. I tried to resolve all the above issues to the best of my abilities so feel free to let me know if there are further issues. -
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
APK Also notifying you so that you are up to date on this.
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 02:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
APK: I assume the first ping was meant to be for
Dcdiehardfan? Indeed, very cool of you DCDHF to do that :) Most of your fixes work quite well – you did miss one of the contractions I was referring to, but honestly it's such a small thing that I can take care of it myself after I hit "publish changes". (For what it's worth, I'd only meant that the contractions should have been expanded, i.e. she's → she is.) My next edit will be to touch up what little else needs to be taken care of; the one after that will involve passing the article. Congratulations, APK! --
Dylan620 (he/him •
talk •
edits) 01:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dylan620 Thank you! And that was my bad haha, but either way, I'm glad that the article has passed! Congrats @
APK!
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 03:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.