![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's clear that someone has put a lot of effort into this article. Bualadh bos libh. However, it needs quite a bit of attention relative to the project norms on tone and commentary. Essay-style editorial flourishes like the below really aren't appropriate to the project, and should likely be reworked or removed.
These are just two examples. A significant bulk of the article reads like this. This type of content isn't entirely compatible with the core pillars of the project (that WP is a fact based encyclopedia (rather than a free content host) and content is neutral in tone (rather than describing the POV of club members).) For example, while a lost match might have been "disappointing" to club members, it isn't to disinterested reader - or perhaps to the guys on the other team :). I'm going to tag the article for clean-up for now. Some work will be required on this article - otherwise it's at risk of significant summarising. If that were to happen, and given that someone clearly did a lot of work on it, it might be worthwhile moving the original content to the club website or a more appropriate content host. Guliolopez ( talk) 12:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
I will think over the points made above and do some editing to address them. This will take a bit of time though. Clareen72 ( talk) 22:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I said as much in 2015. And will state as much again in 2019. Wikipedia is not a free web-hosting service for this club. Unless the longstanding tone, OR and VER issues can be addressed here (in short order), then I'm going to take a fairly heavy-hand myself to address it. (Upon request I gave a "bit of time" to address the points that were raised in October 2015. It is now August 2019. By any measure, "a bit of time" is long since "up".....) Guliolopez ( talk) 16:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's clear that someone has put a lot of effort into this article. Bualadh bos libh. However, it needs quite a bit of attention relative to the project norms on tone and commentary. Essay-style editorial flourishes like the below really aren't appropriate to the project, and should likely be reworked or removed.
These are just two examples. A significant bulk of the article reads like this. This type of content isn't entirely compatible with the core pillars of the project (that WP is a fact based encyclopedia (rather than a free content host) and content is neutral in tone (rather than describing the POV of club members).) For example, while a lost match might have been "disappointing" to club members, it isn't to disinterested reader - or perhaps to the guys on the other team :). I'm going to tag the article for clean-up for now. Some work will be required on this article - otherwise it's at risk of significant summarising. If that were to happen, and given that someone clearly did a lot of work on it, it might be worthwhile moving the original content to the club website or a more appropriate content host. Guliolopez ( talk) 12:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
I will think over the points made above and do some editing to address them. This will take a bit of time though. Clareen72 ( talk) 22:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I said as much in 2015. And will state as much again in 2019. Wikipedia is not a free web-hosting service for this club. Unless the longstanding tone, OR and VER issues can be addressed here (in short order), then I'm going to take a fairly heavy-hand myself to address it. (Upon request I gave a "bit of time" to address the points that were raised in October 2015. It is now August 2019. By any measure, "a bit of time" is long since "up".....) Guliolopez ( talk) 16:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)