This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
In my view this was borderline to accept. Rather than allowing it to languish and eventually fall foul of G13 I chose to accept it and allow the community to reach a conclusion.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm aware of WP:OR but bear with me.
I can't find a single scrap of info anywhere on the Internet on
1. Where in the North Sea this platform used to be 2. When it was built 3. When it was decommissioned 4. Where in the Netherlands it was refurbished 5. What its name used to be
Given the stated dismantling in two days, I think it'd be a shame not to track down and cite any of this for future historians. It is an essential part of the history of the structure. ElectronicsForDogs ( talk) 00:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Rwendland:, your edit summary says "the NAO numbers are just for See Monster, check Fig 9 on page 25/26". I can't see the NAO report in our citations. Do you have a link? Geof Sheppard ( talk) 17:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
In my view this was borderline to accept. Rather than allowing it to languish and eventually fall foul of G13 I chose to accept it and allow the community to reach a conclusion.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm aware of WP:OR but bear with me.
I can't find a single scrap of info anywhere on the Internet on
1. Where in the North Sea this platform used to be 2. When it was built 3. When it was decommissioned 4. Where in the Netherlands it was refurbished 5. What its name used to be
Given the stated dismantling in two days, I think it'd be a shame not to track down and cite any of this for future historians. It is an essential part of the history of the structure. ElectronicsForDogs ( talk) 00:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Rwendland:, your edit summary says "the NAO numbers are just for See Monster, check Fig 9 on page 25/26". I can't see the NAO report in our citations. Do you have a link? Geof Sheppard ( talk) 17:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)