![]() | Section 54 of the Constitution Act, 1867 has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 30, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from Section 54 of the Constitution Act, 1867 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 October 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Detailed discussion of GA nomination: July 2023
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Reviewer: MaxnaCarta ( talk · contribs) 00:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC) GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Please action the following issues as a priority to meet criteria 2b.
Mr Serjeant Buzfuz - Please see above. After a quick scan, I do not foresee any major issues, provided the above is addressed. Please try your best to find some secondary sources for these and let me know what you come up with. This is the only criteria I immediately see that the article does not yet meet. If these are fixed, this should be a simple review. Thanks MC — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
Detailed discussion of DYK nomination: October 2023
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The result was: promoted by
Vaticidalprophet
talk
13:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
( )
Improved to Good Article status by Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Section 54 of the Constitution Act, 1867; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Overall:
|
![]() | Section 54 of the Constitution Act, 1867 has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 30, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from Section 54 of the Constitution Act, 1867 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 October 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Detailed discussion of GA nomination: July 2023
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Reviewer: MaxnaCarta ( talk · contribs) 00:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC) GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Please action the following issues as a priority to meet criteria 2b.
Mr Serjeant Buzfuz - Please see above. After a quick scan, I do not foresee any major issues, provided the above is addressed. Please try your best to find some secondary sources for these and let me know what you come up with. This is the only criteria I immediately see that the article does not yet meet. If these are fixed, this should be a simple review. Thanks MC — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
Detailed discussion of DYK nomination: October 2023
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The result was: promoted by
Vaticidalprophet
talk
13:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
( )
Improved to Good Article status by Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Section 54 of the Constitution Act, 1867; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Overall:
|