This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I recently got a "message" (probably sent by an automatic robot!) [actually, the message is right here, in case you are interested] notifying me about a certain issue (ambiguity in a certain hyperlink I had just added, during a certain recent by me).
I had added a ( wikilink) hyperlink (intended to point from one Wikipedia article to another), and a robot had detected a problem. The problem was, specifically, that the (wikilink) hyperlink pointed to a disambiguation page. It pointed to [the DAB page]: " section".
I checked, and -- sure enough! -- the Wikipedia article " section" (which I had linked to), is indeed a disambiguation page, and it points to several possible [more specific] " section" articles, including this one (<< "You are Here!" >>) ... that is, including Section_(typography).
Upon taking a look at this article ( Section_(typography)), I was curious about whether or not it would serve well, as a [more specific] destination for that "ambiguous" hyperlink that I had just recently added.
I think that this article ( Section_(typography)) might be a good candidate; (even in its present state); ... but IMHO it might be an even better candidate, in the future, if it were to be expanded to mention that one example of a " section", would be a " section" of a Wikipedia article.
One idea:
to modify ("edit") this Wikipedia article -- that is, to edit the article " Section (typography)", to include a "== section ==" called [something like] == a section as a portion or "subdivision" of a Wikipedia article == .
Another idea:
to have a completely new Wikipedia article, with a title something like: " Section (of a Wikipedia article)".
Such as, whether this is a good idea?, and if so, then, which alternative is better? -- Mike Schwartz ( talk) 19:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I recently got a "message" (probably sent by an automatic robot!) [actually, the message is right here, in case you are interested] notifying me about a certain issue (ambiguity in a certain hyperlink I had just added, during a certain recent by me).
I had added a ( wikilink) hyperlink (intended to point from one Wikipedia article to another), and a robot had detected a problem. The problem was, specifically, that the (wikilink) hyperlink pointed to a disambiguation page. It pointed to [the DAB page]: " section".
I checked, and -- sure enough! -- the Wikipedia article " section" (which I had linked to), is indeed a disambiguation page, and it points to several possible [more specific] " section" articles, including this one (<< "You are Here!" >>) ... that is, including Section_(typography).
Upon taking a look at this article ( Section_(typography)), I was curious about whether or not it would serve well, as a [more specific] destination for that "ambiguous" hyperlink that I had just recently added.
I think that this article ( Section_(typography)) might be a good candidate; (even in its present state); ... but IMHO it might be an even better candidate, in the future, if it were to be expanded to mention that one example of a " section", would be a " section" of a Wikipedia article.
One idea:
to modify ("edit") this Wikipedia article -- that is, to edit the article " Section (typography)", to include a "== section ==" called [something like] == a section as a portion or "subdivision" of a Wikipedia article == .
Another idea:
to have a completely new Wikipedia article, with a title something like: " Section (of a Wikipedia article)".
Such as, whether this is a good idea?, and if so, then, which alternative is better? -- Mike Schwartz ( talk) 19:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)