This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as High-importance). Barack Obama ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles

Technically, this is a stub, but it will likely become a "start" shortly. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 02:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply

If it's useful, Newsday ( LI newspaper) has an article on where and how the candidates prepped: [1] czar · · 21:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply

We have articles on individual debates now? –  Muboshgu ( talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC) reply

I think it's a bit ridiculous too. It just makes it harder to actually add information, since it has to be added to both articles or summarized for the other in many cases. Or they just get out of sync (as has inevitably happened already; e.g., the main page having more detail on poll numbers this one, and similar other issues spanning all the debates.) WP:REDUNDANTFORK –  2001:db8:: ( rfc |  diff) 19:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC) reply