![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
There were actually Four articles on this Topic....Namely
Battle of Tarain Battles of Tarain First Battle of Tarain Second battle of Tarain
Now the first three articles have been merged and redirected to a common and more comprehensive Article which is the "Battles of Tarain"... Now I feel if the article of the First Battle is merged into it then we should also redirect the article of the Second battle into it as well... BTW all these articles include almost Identical Information and hence it is useless to have to different articles on the same topic with Identical info.... Adil your ( talk) 01:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I have undone an edit here which seems to alter the figures and not provide any source. It seems like anonymous users coming and changing the numbers is a common occurrence, but there does not seem to be any reason to accept a figure without a reliable source. Akakievich ( talk) 01:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
roy is pro hindu not reliable soucres Rowan8882ij ( talk) 17:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Currently the article contains a reference(Review:NANDINI SINHA KAPUR: State Formation in Rajasthan: Mewar during the Seventh-Fifteenth Centuries) that does NOT support Mathan Singh at the second battle of Tarain. This is source misrepresentation.
The other source, A History of Rajasthan is unviewable and contain no page number(s), which means it fails WP:V.
The IP that has edit warred these sources into the article has told me to "Rv, this review of jornal please check the source from Chapt 5 onwards", is wrong. Per WP:ONUS if the IP wants this information in the article is it their responsibility to provide a reliable source with a page number that supports this information. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 01:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Kansas Bear How can you claim that source did not talk about Mathan Singh ?? He was feudatory of Chahuhan Rajputs, In any case for Kachwaha participation here is the source which is more verificable:-
Jadunath Sarkar (1994). A History of Jaipur: C. 1503-1938. Orient Blackswan. ISBN 978-81-250-0333-5. on page numner 25. 2402:8100:2182:614F:2D99:BFBF:D501:82C6 ( talk) 02:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can anybody pls add another Category i.e. Battles involving the Rajputs. 2409:4051:4E93:566C:8390:7686:9CC9:3C6A ( talk) 01:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Since Sajaypal007 opposed my removal of Prithviraj Raso's account of army strength of the Rajputs, Special:MobileDiff/1090113211 & Special:MobileDiff/1089040449. In my recent edit, Special:MobileDiff/1090427599, I added the number of fatalities on Rajput side from source of Dasharatha Sharma who quoted Hasan Nizami, closest source to the event and it states in the rout, 100,000 Hindu/Rajputs were slained. Thus, the number of 83,000 by fictional Raso is removed as of now, Special:MobileDiff/1090429024. I explained my points on my own talk page as well, Special:MobileDiff/1090134693 & Special:MobileDiff/1090137075. Feel free to discuss it with contrasting reliable sources.
PS:- Ferishta's number might be exaggeration as he claimed it was army of Rajput and Afghans as well; but how much ?? He was tbe closest Persian author who mentioned strength of Rajput army. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 13:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
There were actually Four articles on this Topic....Namely
Battle of Tarain Battles of Tarain First Battle of Tarain Second battle of Tarain
Now the first three articles have been merged and redirected to a common and more comprehensive Article which is the "Battles of Tarain"... Now I feel if the article of the First Battle is merged into it then we should also redirect the article of the Second battle into it as well... BTW all these articles include almost Identical Information and hence it is useless to have to different articles on the same topic with Identical info.... Adil your ( talk) 01:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I have undone an edit here which seems to alter the figures and not provide any source. It seems like anonymous users coming and changing the numbers is a common occurrence, but there does not seem to be any reason to accept a figure without a reliable source. Akakievich ( talk) 01:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
roy is pro hindu not reliable soucres Rowan8882ij ( talk) 17:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Currently the article contains a reference(Review:NANDINI SINHA KAPUR: State Formation in Rajasthan: Mewar during the Seventh-Fifteenth Centuries) that does NOT support Mathan Singh at the second battle of Tarain. This is source misrepresentation.
The other source, A History of Rajasthan is unviewable and contain no page number(s), which means it fails WP:V.
The IP that has edit warred these sources into the article has told me to "Rv, this review of jornal please check the source from Chapt 5 onwards", is wrong. Per WP:ONUS if the IP wants this information in the article is it their responsibility to provide a reliable source with a page number that supports this information. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 01:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Kansas Bear How can you claim that source did not talk about Mathan Singh ?? He was feudatory of Chahuhan Rajputs, In any case for Kachwaha participation here is the source which is more verificable:-
Jadunath Sarkar (1994). A History of Jaipur: C. 1503-1938. Orient Blackswan. ISBN 978-81-250-0333-5. on page numner 25. 2402:8100:2182:614F:2D99:BFBF:D501:82C6 ( talk) 02:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can anybody pls add another Category i.e. Battles involving the Rajputs. 2409:4051:4E93:566C:8390:7686:9CC9:3C6A ( talk) 01:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Since Sajaypal007 opposed my removal of Prithviraj Raso's account of army strength of the Rajputs, Special:MobileDiff/1090113211 & Special:MobileDiff/1089040449. In my recent edit, Special:MobileDiff/1090427599, I added the number of fatalities on Rajput side from source of Dasharatha Sharma who quoted Hasan Nizami, closest source to the event and it states in the rout, 100,000 Hindu/Rajputs were slained. Thus, the number of 83,000 by fictional Raso is removed as of now, Special:MobileDiff/1090429024. I explained my points on my own talk page as well, Special:MobileDiff/1090134693 & Special:MobileDiff/1090137075. Feel free to discuss it with contrasting reliable sources.
PS:- Ferishta's number might be exaggeration as he claimed it was army of Rajput and Afghans as well; but how much ?? He was tbe closest Persian author who mentioned strength of Rajput army. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 13:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)