Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup| former 03:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)  Doing... Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup| former 03:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments

• Shouldn't the map be better than the tank in the infobox? Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup| former 03:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC) reply
  • There isn't a map that covers this battle in any detail. The only map there is used in all the Pusan Perimeter articles, and it covers far too large an area to be useful. — Ed! ^(talk) 14:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC) reply
• There were occasional attacks 9th Infantry forward positions, but to the men in the front line this appeared to be only normal patrol action. → There were occasional attacks on the 9th Infantry's forward positions, but to the men in the front lines this appeared to be only normal patrol action.
  • Not to mention the grammatical errors, patrol action is never normal, since it only takes place during warfare. FAC Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup| former 01:33, 12 March 2011 (UTC) reply
    • Fixed. — Ed! ^(talk) 01:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
• Could you give the dates of the phases of the battle on the headers? I frequently ask for this as it helps navigation. FAC Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup| former 02:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Not practically. The article covers several small battles happening simultaneously across the river front, so most of them have the same dates. Info is broken up by location, not time. — Ed! ^(talk) 19:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC) reply
• ROK units. FAC Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup| former 14:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Fixed. — Ed! ^(talk) 20:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Passed. FAC Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup| former 21:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC) reply