GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 06:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 06:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just a quick update that I am pretty busy for a few days, I assure you I will finish the review next week. I have also stated this on my user page. Thanks for your response. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 19:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Epicgenius: Luckily not so busy today! I must appreciate all the careful research you have done on this article. Go through all my comments; the problems seem to be concentrated in the section "1960s–1970s: Original construction efforts": Sainsf <^> Feel at home 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I will go through the sources a few days later. Rest looks good. Cheers! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
A general question: Where do you and where do you not include the present worth of the erstwhile costs?, I don't really understand whether I am supposed to include the current price of each cost. Also, I don't know what you mean by
What does "will" refer to, though I'll try to explain it (and it doesn't seem to need updating, since the MTA hasn't released any new plans for the Chinatown segment since the original proposal). Thanks for your patience. epicgenius @ 13:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC) ( talk) 13:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Very well. The article now meets all the GA criteria. I am glad to promote such an amazing work! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 14:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 06:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 06:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just a quick update that I am pretty busy for a few days, I assure you I will finish the review next week. I have also stated this on my user page. Thanks for your response. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 19:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Epicgenius: Luckily not so busy today! I must appreciate all the careful research you have done on this article. Go through all my comments; the problems seem to be concentrated in the section "1960s–1970s: Original construction efforts": Sainsf <^> Feel at home 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I will go through the sources a few days later. Rest looks good. Cheers! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
A general question: Where do you and where do you not include the present worth of the erstwhile costs?, I don't really understand whether I am supposed to include the current price of each cost. Also, I don't know what you mean by
What does "will" refer to, though I'll try to explain it (and it doesn't seem to need updating, since the MTA hasn't released any new plans for the Chinatown segment since the original proposal). Thanks for your patience. epicgenius @ 13:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC) ( talk) 13:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Very well. The article now meets all the GA criteria. I am glad to promote such an amazing work! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 14:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)