This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on October 20, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
— JIP | Talk 18:34, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
The article is not neutral in language or tone. For example, it uses the phrase revealed in quoting Baker and recant for the US Govt. See also the use of "only after Baker managed to state". This article reads like a closing argument to the jury on behalf of one party. Further, there are gratuitous, unsourced rhetorical comments, such as the last paragraph about public relations. Finally, the sourcing is suspect given the fact that this is in litigation. If this article were really about Sean Baker, as opposed to agitprop, then where is his date of birth? Where is his high school info? His photo? Joaquin Murietta 17:00, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
No sourcing at all, other than reference to wikipedia articles such as jumpsuit. Joaquin Murietta 17:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Good evening,
Most people had already seen it, but there's a Facebook post going viral, with around 66k shares, and 5.3 likes, of a screenshot of a about a man with the same name, making an offensive comment that's targeted at a person who unfortunetly died in police custody.
My recommendation would be, once a major news outlet has reported this incident, and until its proven it's the same person, the source be posted on this page, as long it conforms to the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy
Thanks, Juanlove5555 ( talk) 00:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
This sentence was just removed by another editor on the grounds of relevance. I would argue that it should stay removed regardless of relevance, because the two sourced articles do not allege that the Sean Baker Sr who posted the offensive comment is the same individual who was beaten in Guantanamo. A picture is included, which does appear to match pictures from interviews, but relying on that would be Original Research, and especially suspect original research, because it relies on the work of a doxxing group who one article implied to have incorrectly guessed his job. Maltice ( talk) 15:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on October 20, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
— JIP | Talk 18:34, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
The article is not neutral in language or tone. For example, it uses the phrase revealed in quoting Baker and recant for the US Govt. See also the use of "only after Baker managed to state". This article reads like a closing argument to the jury on behalf of one party. Further, there are gratuitous, unsourced rhetorical comments, such as the last paragraph about public relations. Finally, the sourcing is suspect given the fact that this is in litigation. If this article were really about Sean Baker, as opposed to agitprop, then where is his date of birth? Where is his high school info? His photo? Joaquin Murietta 17:00, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
No sourcing at all, other than reference to wikipedia articles such as jumpsuit. Joaquin Murietta 17:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Good evening,
Most people had already seen it, but there's a Facebook post going viral, with around 66k shares, and 5.3 likes, of a screenshot of a about a man with the same name, making an offensive comment that's targeted at a person who unfortunetly died in police custody.
My recommendation would be, once a major news outlet has reported this incident, and until its proven it's the same person, the source be posted on this page, as long it conforms to the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy
Thanks, Juanlove5555 ( talk) 00:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
This sentence was just removed by another editor on the grounds of relevance. I would argue that it should stay removed regardless of relevance, because the two sourced articles do not allege that the Sean Baker Sr who posted the offensive comment is the same individual who was beaten in Guantanamo. A picture is included, which does appear to match pictures from interviews, but relying on that would be Original Research, and especially suspect original research, because it relies on the work of a doxxing group who one article implied to have incorrectly guessed his job. Maltice ( talk) 15:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)