This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm curious.. I don't want this page to be deleted, in fact I think it's too small. But I want to know, if, when I next went to the park, I took the time to find out all I could about the history of Seabreeze, via the signs posted around the park at various places, would that be considered original research since I can't really cite the signs? I'm assuming I understand the definition of original research, and that asking historians and people who work there about Seabreeze would /definately/ be original research.. -- Zalethon ( Talk) 18:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Not for nothing about this article, but just a comment ... the loss of PTC 36 was one of the saddest days for Rochester. I spent plenty of days as a kid both at Roseland Park in Canandaigua and a Seabreeze (and at least one day at Olympic Park -- anyone remember that one?), but what I remember best about Seabreeze was always the carousel. Such a shame, even 12+ years later. -- CPAScott 20:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I know, sad. :( I'm a Seabreeze FREAK (look at my username) who lives in SD now. Long live Seabreeze!! WhirlWindSpin 22:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Multiple times on this page, it's claimed that Seabreeze has "something for the whole family" or other phrases to that effect. Several sentences read as if they could have been copied and pasted directly from the park's website. I made my account approximately five minutes ago, so I'm not sure how to do this, but does anyone else think this article could use the banner that links to the "no advertising/soapboxing" clause? Knowerofthings0923 ( talk) 22:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm curious.. I don't want this page to be deleted, in fact I think it's too small. But I want to know, if, when I next went to the park, I took the time to find out all I could about the history of Seabreeze, via the signs posted around the park at various places, would that be considered original research since I can't really cite the signs? I'm assuming I understand the definition of original research, and that asking historians and people who work there about Seabreeze would /definately/ be original research.. -- Zalethon ( Talk) 18:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Not for nothing about this article, but just a comment ... the loss of PTC 36 was one of the saddest days for Rochester. I spent plenty of days as a kid both at Roseland Park in Canandaigua and a Seabreeze (and at least one day at Olympic Park -- anyone remember that one?), but what I remember best about Seabreeze was always the carousel. Such a shame, even 12+ years later. -- CPAScott 20:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I know, sad. :( I'm a Seabreeze FREAK (look at my username) who lives in SD now. Long live Seabreeze!! WhirlWindSpin 22:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Multiple times on this page, it's claimed that Seabreeze has "something for the whole family" or other phrases to that effect. Several sentences read as if they could have been copied and pasted directly from the park's website. I made my account approximately five minutes ago, so I'm not sure how to do this, but does anyone else think this article could use the banner that links to the "no advertising/soapboxing" clause? Knowerofthings0923 ( talk) 22:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)