The threat discussion wanders off course with "and could also negatively affect anemone shrimp, and any organisms obligately associated with sea anemones. Anemonefish can survive alone in captivity, as has been shown by multiple research efforts." Some of this could be salvaged by reorganising ("Impact" or something) but it's basically very close to being off-topic.
The section was originally called "Exploitation", was three times longer and a POV problem. I cut it down and have now trimmed some more and renamed the section.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
19:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)reply
There is a photo of Mackenzia on Commons, wrongly labelled as a holothurian.
I suppose I did find it but it is difficult to interpret and I was unimpressed. If I used it I could caption it "Sea anemones do not fossilize well, having no hard parts, and this one was mistakenly identified as a sea cucumber."
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
09:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)reply
That's a truly unclear anatomy diagram, made worse by the choice of colours and the labels which are at once vague (not reaching their targets) and intrusive (with heavy and unnecessary arrowheads).
The Taxonomy section is conspicuously lacking a cladogram (or indeed two of them, external and internal relationships). At least an external one is needed: I can draw it for you if you point me to a suitable source.
I find taxonomy difficult, and I have hardly touched the section. With regard to cladograms, I have never created one, but there is one that could be used for guidance in
Anthozoa, referenced to Stampar. For the internal relationships, Rodriguez 2014 would be best. If you feel like doing them, that would be splendid.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
09:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The threat discussion wanders off course with "and could also negatively affect anemone shrimp, and any organisms obligately associated with sea anemones. Anemonefish can survive alone in captivity, as has been shown by multiple research efforts." Some of this could be salvaged by reorganising ("Impact" or something) but it's basically very close to being off-topic.
The section was originally called "Exploitation", was three times longer and a POV problem. I cut it down and have now trimmed some more and renamed the section.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
19:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)reply
There is a photo of Mackenzia on Commons, wrongly labelled as a holothurian.
I suppose I did find it but it is difficult to interpret and I was unimpressed. If I used it I could caption it "Sea anemones do not fossilize well, having no hard parts, and this one was mistakenly identified as a sea cucumber."
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
09:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)reply
That's a truly unclear anatomy diagram, made worse by the choice of colours and the labels which are at once vague (not reaching their targets) and intrusive (with heavy and unnecessary arrowheads).
The Taxonomy section is conspicuously lacking a cladogram (or indeed two of them, external and internal relationships). At least an external one is needed: I can draw it for you if you point me to a suitable source.
I find taxonomy difficult, and I have hardly touched the section. With regard to cladograms, I have never created one, but there is one that could be used for guidance in
Anthozoa, referenced to Stampar. For the internal relationships, Rodriguez 2014 would be best. If you feel like doing them, that would be splendid.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
09:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)reply