![]() | Scyllarides latus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 31, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that all that remains of the
type specimen of the
Mediterranean slipper lobster (pictured) is a 16th century
watercolour? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I find this numbr remarkable since lobsters are not kosher. Should it be mentioned? -- Error ( talk) 21:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Is there any information on what happened to the type specimen? (e.g. fire/flood/lost/stolen/eaten/sold to private collector/etc) I tried to go to the reference listed, but I'm getting an "Internal Server Error" on the website. -- 174.21.224.109 ( talk) 22:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
@ Stemonitis:, the image I used for the taxobox is the correct ID, and a much better, sharper image than what was there originally. It shows far more detail and accurate coloring. Not sure why you're saying it is an incorrect id. Atsme 📞 📧 15:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | Scyllarides latus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 31, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that all that remains of the
type specimen of the
Mediterranean slipper lobster (pictured) is a 16th century
watercolour? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I find this numbr remarkable since lobsters are not kosher. Should it be mentioned? -- Error ( talk) 21:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Is there any information on what happened to the type specimen? (e.g. fire/flood/lost/stolen/eaten/sold to private collector/etc) I tried to go to the reference listed, but I'm getting an "Internal Server Error" on the website. -- 174.21.224.109 ( talk) 22:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
@ Stemonitis:, the image I used for the taxobox is the correct ID, and a much better, sharper image than what was there originally. It shows far more detail and accurate coloring. Not sure why you're saying it is an incorrect id. Atsme 📞 📧 15:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)