![]() | Scotland under the Commonwealth has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 8, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Scotland under the Commonwealth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I confess to being ignorant of exactly the implication. At the least, could there be an inline cite for this in the lead, as a quote? Also in the lead, what is a sectary?? And non-Scottish readers may not know what "the Kirk" is. hamiltonstone ( talk) 12:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 ( talk · contribs) 00:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Background
Constitutional status
Administration
Resistance
Religion
'Economy and taxation
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Well-cited throughout |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Source spotchecks were good |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | all the main aspects have been included, no extraneous material |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | succinct |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No detectable bias |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | no issues with edit warring or recent major changes |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | all captions are pertinent and relevant |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Lead
Background
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Constitutional status
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Administration
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Resistance
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Religion
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
'Economy and taxation
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Scotland under the Commonwealth has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 8, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Scotland under the Commonwealth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I confess to being ignorant of exactly the implication. At the least, could there be an inline cite for this in the lead, as a quote? Also in the lead, what is a sectary?? And non-Scottish readers may not know what "the Kirk" is. hamiltonstone ( talk) 12:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 ( talk · contribs) 00:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Background
Constitutional status
Administration
Resistance
Religion
'Economy and taxation
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Well-cited throughout |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Source spotchecks were good |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | all the main aspects have been included, no extraneous material |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | succinct |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No detectable bias |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | no issues with edit warring or recent major changes |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | all captions are pertinent and relevant |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Lead
Background
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Constitutional status
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Administration
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Resistance
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Religion
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
'Economy and taxation
Done.--
SabreBD (
talk)
21:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)