![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If one examines the 1599 Geneva Bible, available at Amazon, you will find it first had a commentary known as the notes of the reformers. It is said these notes so aggravated the King James that he had an "Authorized" translation made without notes. Someone please take note of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.74.250 ( talk) 21:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
NY Jewry funded the Zionist Bible. Is Wiki so Jewashed that this isn't even mentioned? 2607:FEA8:2A64:5900:C0CE:B7B7:ECCE:F4C1 ( talk) 22:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If one examines the 1599 Geneva Bible, available at Amazon, you will find it first had a commentary known as the notes of the reformers. It is said these notes so aggravated the King James that he had an "Authorized" translation made without notes. Someone please take note of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.74.250 ( talk) 21:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
NY Jewry funded the Zionist Bible. Is Wiki so Jewashed that this isn't even mentioned? 2607:FEA8:2A64:5900:C0CE:B7B7:ECCE:F4C1 ( talk) 22:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC)