This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophy of science Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why does this page redirect to Scientific method when that article mentions pluralism exactly 0 times? 37.197.249.195 ( talk) 12:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC) reply

From the history, it appears that a single editor in 2011 decided that scientific pluralism is "bollocks" and redirected the article despite it containing a bibliography with several academic sources. Even worse, it somehow stayed redirected for a decade! It's just embarrassing, but I've now belatedly created a new article on the subject to replace the redirect. -- RL0919 ( talk) 10:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply