This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state) Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think this should stay as a re-direct at minimum becuase it's likely to be a search term but absent finding more sources, any thoughts on merging it with the uni? _{TravellingCari} ^{the Busy Bee} 17:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply

• Support Merge/Redirect per nom. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 17:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep. The template that I put up at the top wasn't intended as an AFD nomination. Some things are inherently notable. Although a small science museum might not be so obviously notable I am hoping that there are additional paper sources out there that will support the retention of this as a separate article. (If somebody actually nominated it for deletion, I might vote for "merge and redirect," but it hasn't, and I won't.) 69.140.152.55 ( talk) 00:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Linking related discussion: I know you didn't nominate it, but the lack of notability was something I was thinking of even as I created this. I'm shocked that there's so little turning up -- even from the uni newspaper which makes me think it may be operating under another name as well. I ned to do some digging. _{TravellingCari} ^{the Busy Bee} 04:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep because there are sources that can be used to flesh out this article. I didn't find them in a Google News Archives search, but these articles from the Oneonta Daily Star are on the web, free for the picking:
  • Reads gave back to community, see second half of article
  • "Oneonta couple earn honor for dedication to community"
  • "Retired director says he’ll still help out"

Noroton ( talk) 04:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Good find, thanks Noroton! I'm going to add them to the article in a moment to help flesh it out. _{TravellingCari} ^{the Busy Bee} 13:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply

(I also left this note for 69... on the talk page in case s/he isn't watching the page) I removed the source in the see-also section because it appears that he received the grant for work unrelated to the science center. If I'm wrong, please feel free to re-add it. The link above is a direct link to the article, not password protected. _{TravellingCari} ^{the Busy Bee} 14:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply