This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Science Centre Singapore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Instantnood and Novacatz has persisted in attempting to remove the above phrase from this article, with Novacatz calling it a Peacock term. This is despite the fact that a simple google search would have shown that the centre was rated as one of the world's top ten [1]. Is there any evidence to demonstrate otherwise, failing which there is little reason to remove it?-- Huaiwei 09:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Blatant and obvious revert warring. Let me try one more time -- edit summaries are not the place for debate that's what this sparsely populated page is for. Revert warring is never acceptable. -- Wgfinley 20:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Science Centre Singapore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Instantnood and Novacatz has persisted in attempting to remove the above phrase from this article, with Novacatz calling it a Peacock term. This is despite the fact that a simple google search would have shown that the centre was rated as one of the world's top ten [1]. Is there any evidence to demonstrate otherwise, failing which there is little reason to remove it?-- Huaiwei 09:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Blatant and obvious revert warring. Let me try one more time -- edit summaries are not the place for debate that's what this sparsely populated page is for. Revert warring is never acceptable. -- Wgfinley 20:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)