![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I work for Scholastic, and there are some pretty significant errors (all that can be checked at About Scholastic) on this page, including:
Strabucchi ( talk) 23:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
This page is so pathetic that words fail me. 67.171.168.153 19:30, 2004 Jul 22
Why is this title saying Scholastic Press instead of Scholastic Corporation?
Why is there no article about Read 180??? ( Superjustinbros. 21:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC))
Do we really need such a long section on the awards, or the boilerplate-sounding description of the "remarkable" people who've received them? I can see having a paragraph, but if we're going to get into a listing of them, it should be in a separate article on the awards, if they merit that much attention. There are other sections which sound "ripped from the [PR] headlines," including the overly comprehensive listing of their titles; wouldn't a listing of just their best-selling series titles do? Lawikitejana ( talk) 06:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
imprint of major publisher; the material would be better merged with a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Cant find any other reference to its "soon to be British-based subsidiary Pearson PLC",so im removing it. Gregory1132 ( talk) 10:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Looks like this merge was never performed. I'll do it this week. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 14:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Children's Press doesn't appear to be notable by itself; I'll merge it with this article soon, if there are no objections. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 14:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Scholastic Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
The tags suggested that this article was written as advertising copy. Perhaps reading WP:MOS before doing a cut and paste job would have helped. I have deleted vast amounts that I couldn't verify. All the deleted material can be found using View History. When Wp:RS secondary sources have been found some can be replaced- the use of lists is deprecated, and more so could be a copyvio. ClemRutter ( talk) 16:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
On October 22, 2020, Scholastic celebrated it’s 100th anniversary. 2600:1008:B104:EC55:1D60:13E4:E629:8798 ( talk) 00:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
In December 2015, Scholastic launched the Scholastic Reads Podcasts. 2600:1008:B1A2:D5C:ECE1:493B:FDE5:8068 ( talk) 18:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Scholastic became involved in the television market in 2018. 2600:1008:B11E:E4DC:11B5:3F45:86BE:C03E ( talk) 23:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
In 2017, Scholastic released the Magic School Bus Rides Again with Nickelodeon productions. 2600:1008:B12E:C259:8DB:F9B3:C5F3:22C7 ( talk) 16:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
In 2016, Scholastic published dog man by Dav pilkey. 2600:1008:B12E:C259:511:5EE3:69CA:2F21 ( talk) 23:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
In 1995, Scholastic Productions produced the very hungry caterpillar and other stories with illuminated films. 2600:1008:B189:4752:FC86:612E:290D:52A6 ( talk) 22:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
This information about the Scholastic Corporation needs some updates 2601:246:5401:9DCC:9538:A06C:90AE:BF41 ( talk) 23:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I’m a stupid teen, but could someone add a section about Homebase? It’s one of their side projects, kinda burning down rn, but I figured it should be noted. One problem though- I can’t find ANY information on it besides the official launchers, and a quick blurb on the Dogman wiki, of all places. So uhhh yeah- 73.216.104.71 ( talk) 20:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The article itself feels a little bit too biased to the corporation, as if Scholastic themselves made the page. First of all, the page doesn’t have any criticism or controversy sub sections which is always a big red flag for me. Then, the article itself feels a bit too happy, without looking into some more negative aspects of the company. Dumdum56 ( talk) 12:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Graphix has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 9 § Graphix until a consensus is reached.
Jay
💬
07:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Real lives universally equated by forgiveness sometimes of all milky way like ours plus like our universe fragile yet stretching by human race slowly over years. 2001:569:FDE7:2B00:CD06:42DA:263E:BACF ( talk) 15:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I work for Scholastic, and there are some pretty significant errors (all that can be checked at About Scholastic) on this page, including:
Strabucchi ( talk) 23:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
This page is so pathetic that words fail me. 67.171.168.153 19:30, 2004 Jul 22
Why is this title saying Scholastic Press instead of Scholastic Corporation?
Why is there no article about Read 180??? ( Superjustinbros. 21:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC))
Do we really need such a long section on the awards, or the boilerplate-sounding description of the "remarkable" people who've received them? I can see having a paragraph, but if we're going to get into a listing of them, it should be in a separate article on the awards, if they merit that much attention. There are other sections which sound "ripped from the [PR] headlines," including the overly comprehensive listing of their titles; wouldn't a listing of just their best-selling series titles do? Lawikitejana ( talk) 06:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
imprint of major publisher; the material would be better merged with a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Cant find any other reference to its "soon to be British-based subsidiary Pearson PLC",so im removing it. Gregory1132 ( talk) 10:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Looks like this merge was never performed. I'll do it this week. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 14:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Children's Press doesn't appear to be notable by itself; I'll merge it with this article soon, if there are no objections. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 14:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Scholastic Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
The tags suggested that this article was written as advertising copy. Perhaps reading WP:MOS before doing a cut and paste job would have helped. I have deleted vast amounts that I couldn't verify. All the deleted material can be found using View History. When Wp:RS secondary sources have been found some can be replaced- the use of lists is deprecated, and more so could be a copyvio. ClemRutter ( talk) 16:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
On October 22, 2020, Scholastic celebrated it’s 100th anniversary. 2600:1008:B104:EC55:1D60:13E4:E629:8798 ( talk) 00:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
In December 2015, Scholastic launched the Scholastic Reads Podcasts. 2600:1008:B1A2:D5C:ECE1:493B:FDE5:8068 ( talk) 18:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Scholastic became involved in the television market in 2018. 2600:1008:B11E:E4DC:11B5:3F45:86BE:C03E ( talk) 23:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
In 2017, Scholastic released the Magic School Bus Rides Again with Nickelodeon productions. 2600:1008:B12E:C259:8DB:F9B3:C5F3:22C7 ( talk) 16:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
In 2016, Scholastic published dog man by Dav pilkey. 2600:1008:B12E:C259:511:5EE3:69CA:2F21 ( talk) 23:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
In 1995, Scholastic Productions produced the very hungry caterpillar and other stories with illuminated films. 2600:1008:B189:4752:FC86:612E:290D:52A6 ( talk) 22:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
This information about the Scholastic Corporation needs some updates 2601:246:5401:9DCC:9538:A06C:90AE:BF41 ( talk) 23:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I’m a stupid teen, but could someone add a section about Homebase? It’s one of their side projects, kinda burning down rn, but I figured it should be noted. One problem though- I can’t find ANY information on it besides the official launchers, and a quick blurb on the Dogman wiki, of all places. So uhhh yeah- 73.216.104.71 ( talk) 20:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The article itself feels a little bit too biased to the corporation, as if Scholastic themselves made the page. First of all, the page doesn’t have any criticism or controversy sub sections which is always a big red flag for me. Then, the article itself feels a bit too happy, without looking into some more negative aspects of the company. Dumdum56 ( talk) 12:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Graphix has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 9 § Graphix until a consensus is reached.
Jay
💬
07:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Real lives universally equated by forgiveness sometimes of all milky way like ours plus like our universe fragile yet stretching by human race slowly over years. 2001:569:FDE7:2B00:CD06:42DA:263E:BACF ( talk) 15:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)