![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a computing diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) -- Xfxie ( talk) 18:19, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
1. This page only introduces an adaptive traffic control system based on the same style as two other adaptive traffic control systems in wiki:
2. Modifications have been made based on the suggestions from JamesBWatson:
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... Author just created the article yesterday and is working to tone down the non-neutral point of view. There is a likely COI, in that the author is quoting some of his own papers, but this is a matter of editing, not whole article deletion. Other reasons this deletion is not uncontroversial:
-- Mark viking ( talk) 19:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because...
I've added a quick-and-dirty criticism section. Given time, I'm sure that genuine anti-traffic-signal activists will come forth with more thoughtful material about why traffic signals are ruinous.
I concur with what User:Mark viking said about the notability of the topic.
I don't see any V1agr@ or your photos as promised here. Doing research, starting a company, building a prototype, getting a city to test it, talking to reporters, and publishing in a scientific journal don't seem like a typical spammer's modus operandi. Tagging it for NPOV NPOV or
WP:COI would have been more suitable.
--
24.24.214.15 (
talk)
00:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved, not in common usage, but redirect created. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 02:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Scalable Urban Traffic Control → SURTRAC – shorter and more memorable name. Relisted. 15:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 24.24.214.15 ( talk) 22:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a computing diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) -- Xfxie ( talk) 18:19, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
1. This page only introduces an adaptive traffic control system based on the same style as two other adaptive traffic control systems in wiki:
2. Modifications have been made based on the suggestions from JamesBWatson:
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... Author just created the article yesterday and is working to tone down the non-neutral point of view. There is a likely COI, in that the author is quoting some of his own papers, but this is a matter of editing, not whole article deletion. Other reasons this deletion is not uncontroversial:
-- Mark viking ( talk) 19:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because...
I've added a quick-and-dirty criticism section. Given time, I'm sure that genuine anti-traffic-signal activists will come forth with more thoughtful material about why traffic signals are ruinous.
I concur with what User:Mark viking said about the notability of the topic.
I don't see any V1agr@ or your photos as promised here. Doing research, starting a company, building a prototype, getting a city to test it, talking to reporters, and publishing in a scientific journal don't seem like a typical spammer's modus operandi. Tagging it for NPOV NPOV or
WP:COI would have been more suitable.
--
24.24.214.15 (
talk)
00:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved, not in common usage, but redirect created. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 02:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Scalable Urban Traffic Control → SURTRAC – shorter and more memorable name. Relisted. 15:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 24.24.214.15 ( talk) 22:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)