Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MsDusa ( talk · contribs) 18:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

You ever just not have anything to say in a GAN? - Whadup, it's ya girl, Dusa ( talk) 03:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Well, thank you!-- Alexandra ^IDV 15:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply