![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
There is a section for shia view also another section was sourced from another wikipedia article copy and paste style so it has to be removed or a proper reference provided. 82.132.186.138 ( talk) 16:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
@ ShuratiMuslim: in your latest edits here and here (combined view [1]), you have moved sourced text away from its sources (e.g., "It also contains important information[...]", "Little is known about Sayf's life.", etc.), you have added information based on inappropriate use of primary sources (only citing al-Tabari for "According to some sources, Sayf's full name was Sayf ibn Umar al-Usayyidi al-Tamimi" is original research), you have added information based on unreliable sources ( https://www.al-islam.org/abdullah-ibn-saba-and-other-myths-sayyid-murtadha-al-askari/investigation-concerning-saif-and-his), and you have removed sourced information without any explanation (e.g., "on the structure of early Muslim armies"). Moreover, you introduced a copyright violation by literally copying text from https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-the-medieval-chronicle/sayf-ibn-umar-SIM_00255?lang=en . This is not acceptable. You should argue and convince other editors here on the talk page that your proposed edits should stay (see WP:CONSENSUS). If not, they will be reverted. Thanks for taking this into consideration. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 16:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I forgot to mention that if you would like other editors' opinion on the reliability of an article by Murtada Sharif 'Askari published by al-islam.org, we have a special place on Wikipedia to ask this kind of question, called Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. If you go there to ask about this source, please don't forget to mention that we have an article on the organization behind the website, Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Apaugasma: Thank you for adding the template back. Can you please tell why did you remove my edits in 'Works' heading. ShuratiMuslim 11:55, 8 October 2021
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
There is a section for shia view also another section was sourced from another wikipedia article copy and paste style so it has to be removed or a proper reference provided. 82.132.186.138 ( talk) 16:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
@ ShuratiMuslim: in your latest edits here and here (combined view [1]), you have moved sourced text away from its sources (e.g., "It also contains important information[...]", "Little is known about Sayf's life.", etc.), you have added information based on inappropriate use of primary sources (only citing al-Tabari for "According to some sources, Sayf's full name was Sayf ibn Umar al-Usayyidi al-Tamimi" is original research), you have added information based on unreliable sources ( https://www.al-islam.org/abdullah-ibn-saba-and-other-myths-sayyid-murtadha-al-askari/investigation-concerning-saif-and-his), and you have removed sourced information without any explanation (e.g., "on the structure of early Muslim armies"). Moreover, you introduced a copyright violation by literally copying text from https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-the-medieval-chronicle/sayf-ibn-umar-SIM_00255?lang=en . This is not acceptable. You should argue and convince other editors here on the talk page that your proposed edits should stay (see WP:CONSENSUS). If not, they will be reverted. Thanks for taking this into consideration. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 16:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I forgot to mention that if you would like other editors' opinion on the reliability of an article by Murtada Sharif 'Askari published by al-islam.org, we have a special place on Wikipedia to ask this kind of question, called Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. If you go there to ask about this source, please don't forget to mention that we have an article on the organization behind the website, Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Apaugasma: Thank you for adding the template back. Can you please tell why did you remove my edits in 'Works' heading. ShuratiMuslim 11:55, 8 October 2021