This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
It seems like there's more at the Saw V#Sequel section. Does anymore else think we should redirect for now? -- H E L LØ Ŧ H E R E 22:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
The release date will be 10/23/09, not 10/30/09. Every Saw film has been released the Friday before Halloween. This incorrect date of 10/30 should be changed. - Russell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.233.138 ( talk) 04:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
...I don't think you understand how time works. Halloween is October 31st, a Saturday. Meaning Friday October 30th is the Friday before Halloween. Dragon of the Pants ( talk) 20:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
SAW VI has not yet been confirmed by LionsGate, there is reference to there being a SAW VI and also a further four more in the SAW series. But untill this is confirmed in writing, by ether LionsGate or the other participating companys. Then the page itself needs to be removed, also reference in other sections for the "Un confirmed" release of SAW VI need to be removed as well. mapadale ( talk) 08:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
i made the page with a template for "future film" however my internet connection was interrupted and i was unable to finish the page. Saw VI has had enough press release information, i believe, to warrant a page. If you will take note, the page for SAW V was created long before the release date. Also, as this is the next series in the title, i feel it appropriate that the page be made already. I will revert the page back to how it was when i left it, and continue from where i left. thankyou. Corythepaperboy ( talk) 03:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
I think you're just being rude and sarcastic by this stage. There are plenty of pages worthy of your attention; junk, etc. This page is worthy of existing; even if filming has not yet commenced. It will save time when it IS being filmed, as it will already be made. Set a date; this time next year, if nothing has been comfirmed about it being filmed or not, then delete the page. Corythepaperboy ( talk) 06:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC) I will also point out that "The winner of the VH1 reality show Scream Queens will win a role in the film" This confirms enough that there will be a SAW VI; contracts made by the Scream Queens management would not allow otherwise. Could you imagine? Hey, you MIGHT win a role in a film that MAY NOT be made. Unlikely, I'm sorry. So just let the page be. Thanks. Corythepaperboy ( talk) 06:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
CAN SOMEBODY FIX THE SUMMERY, PLEASE? LAWRENCE GORDON MAKES NO APPEARENCE IN THE FILM. THE LAST SENTENCE OF THE SUMMARY IS A LIE! LAWRENCE NEVER APPEARS AT THE LAST SECOND LAUGHING. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatkrazyguyukno ( talk • contribs) 12:38, October 24, 2009
I have made Saw VI into a full, cited, and encyclopedic article using FACTS about the CONFIRMED film. Everything is substantiated here and the one part that said something similar to "Cary Elwes MAY reappear in the film" has been put as exactly that by the source and the possibility is verifiable.
Therefore, this is a good article that has no reason to be put back to a redirect. Please discuss any thoughts if this article's worthiness here.
Thanks, GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 06:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh shit, it's been deleted !! There's no reason te remove this article. Nico92400 ( talk) 16:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone else see a reason to incorporate the fact that the Saw videogame will release in the same timeframe? Though, they are separate media forms and different plot lines. Any ideas? GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 10:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
No, not really. All the information about the videogame is contained in its own article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.99.109 ( talk) 20:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Does this article deserve a semi-protection yet ? Removing Cary Elwes in Casting section create an editing conflict. Still there's no cource for that Nico92400 ( talk) 20:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
So, Lionsgate has released the official plot synopsis, and I think for the time being, it should remain quoted, as-is, without changes or embelishment. Someone has already tried to edit it from it's original wording, and it read awkwardly and sounded unsure and even like the person was just assuming details based on the two sentences we have. It's been changed back by someone else for now. I just think that until we get more official details, it needs to stay as-is. MaximumMadnessStixon ( talk) 01:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
A lot is buzzing in the Saw community about speculation that Dr. Gordon from Saw I will return. I know that it has been prevalent in all of the movies for a Dr. Gordon appearance, but I also think that it should be noted in this article since there has been much evidence accumulated since —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.76.236 ( talk) 00:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Just so we're clear, the Sequel section doesn't really belong here. It belongs at Saw (franchise)#Future. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The Dvd Will Be Released January 19th 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.95.91.109 ( talk) 02:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC) This Was Announced In June 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejace3836 ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I reverted this article down to Start class as it does not qualify for a C class quite yet. All Saw films, I-V, are much more detailed and thorough articles and have only a Start class themselves. Until more information arises and a more clened up article is presented, it should remain Start class. Seeing as Saw is the highest grossing horror franchise in history (including inflation) and it has been recognized in popular culture endless times, it does earn a Mid importance rating. GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 01:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
There is no evidence, nor is there a source to state what the projected amount is. This information should either be removed, or a source provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samyueru ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1233227/board/nest/147322632?p=1 here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigkiller3836 ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
hey can someone tell me why you guys will post there is new posters but none of the three trailers are posted here ?
The infomation to be edited takes time. k. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 00:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)) Yeah umm the fil is planned to make 19.6 million on the 2nd day of the opening so ummm.... don;t need a source just wait... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigkiller3836 ( talk • contribs) 14:45, September 18, 2009
I read somewhere (not a forum, an actual source), that the box that Jill got contained incriminating information on Hoffman, which puts them in pursuit of him. This causes Hoffman to kidnap Erickson and put him in a trap to subside suspicion on Hoffman. Can anyone find a source for that? It may have been removed since I can't find it anymore. GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 04:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
ANSWERS & SPOILERS - BEWARE!!! That's half true. The box contains 6 tests that John wants carried out, one of which is on Hoffman, also a package that is dropped through a door mail-slot by Jill to an unknown person, the contents of which are also unknown. However, Erickson is not kidnapped, nor is he put in a trap. I won't ruin it by saying more. Benatfleshofthestars —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.146.89 ( talk • contribs) 14:27, October 24, 2009
Jon Mack's character's name is "Jane". -- OkayDock ( talk) 02:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Well from what I saw on he Wiki page her characters name is Simone. Look for your selves Tanedra Howard -- Spiderman2351 ( talk) 05:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Spiderman2351
In one week time all will be revealed. I promise you I am seeing it next Friday and I will add the pertinent details. Darrenhusted ( talk) 01:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
I discovered it is officially that her name is Simone. Jamesbanesmith ( talk) 05:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
I learned that George Newbern has joined the cast as Harold. Coincidentally, Cary Elwes ( Saw), Scott Patterson ( Saw IV, Saw V), and Newbern were all part of the DCAU: Elwes voiced Paxton Powers in Batman Beyond, Patterson voiced King Faraday in Justice League Unlimited, and Newbern voiced Superman in Justice League, Justice League Unlimited and an episode of Static Shock. Did you know that?
For those who already seen the film, what role does Harold play in this movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.46.105 ( talk) 06:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Nope, he's a guy who was denied insurance coverage by William. He is barely shown in the film, although his family plays a decent role because of him. GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 05:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering, does anyone know what the Runtime for this movie is? I looked on www.empiretheatres.com, and they say 120 minutes, but other sites say 90 minutes. Could someone please clarify it for me? Thanks. Queen kitten ( talk) 10:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
It's 93 minutes guy's [ [1]] Whatever you do don't put this in the main page Okay ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 00:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC))
That fine stay at 93 minutes I just needed to show this, Also Saw V is not 92 minutes it's 88. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 20:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC))
90 minutes is correct. Benatfleshofthestars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.146.89 ( talk) 14:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Can I suggest that the plot NOT be written in full until the 23rd? -- Micwa ( talk) 23:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I just went over the plot and revised some glaring errors. I added a spoiler tag too, but I'm wasn't sure how it should be formatted so I just took one I'd seen before. -- Dpsaves ( talk) 05:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
John did not know that Amanda was responsible for the loss of the baby. The letter threatened to tell him of it if she didn't kill Lynn. That part of the synopsis needs to be changed. Also, it mentions that Hoffman gets out of the reverse beartrap, but doesn't mention that the whole right side of his face is ripped off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itswhatiam ( talk • contribs) 07:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
There are still MAJOR errors in the plot summary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girlingreen23 ( talk • contribs) 13:45, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
There are some details from the first trap that aren't mentioned, like that the man and woman are coworkers at a predatory lending facility, and that the obese man is slicing off pieces of his belly fat to move his scale. Maybe someone could mention that Hoffman and the woman have an exchange in the hospital a little later, where it appears that she learned nothing from the experience after being asked by Hoffman if she learned anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwither01 ( talk • contribs) 14:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Uh is it nesscsary to put the actor's name beside the character in the plot? That's what the Cast section is for. I already changed it once... --
Micwa (
talk)
06:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
There are people posting that Dr. Gordon is in the film, Which is a big lie Please be sure if anything with Dr. Gordon in the plot is Removed. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 20:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC))
There was a section in the plot of Gordon's fate then the ending's last shot was of Gordon these Users must not to be messing with this page most of all Wikipedia it's self they can be banned. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 01:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC))
Please, somebody, remove Dr. Gordon from the main summary of the film. It is a lie and misleading to others. Can somebody change the summary to remove Dr. Gordon from the final sentence, ending the summary at "Hoffman screaming at the rooftop"? ( Thatkrazyguyukno
I have just edited the reception again. The usual way to right reception from rotten tomatoes in to simply say that the film currently has a (%) 'Fresh/Rotten' rating based on (no. of reviews). There is no need to add 'North American and selected International critics' because depending on the country you live in, reviews are displayed differently. In America you will see American reviews first and international reviews last. In Australia its the other way around. Please leave the page as it is, it is currently the same as almost all other Rotten Tomatoes references. User talk:Benatfleshofthestars —Preceding undated comment added 01:12, October 24, 2009.
[ [2]] The Film Has Made 14.8 million and is made on $11 million view your self. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.72.98.45 ( talk) 20:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I'm seriously tired of people adding the Gordon text in. I don't care what it says on IMDb, the forums there are not reliable. Can someone settle whether or not he was in the film? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Just saw the film and he is absolutely NOT in the film. Benatfleshofthestars —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.146.89 ( talk) 14:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I Have A Source It Made 7 Million on Friday.
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/paranormal-activity-scares-up-friday-crown-saw-vi-scares-away-audiences-vampires-assistant-cant-scare-up-viewers/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.72.98.45 ( talk) 17:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Is health care so bad in Spain or why is this film only allowed in 8 theaters? Ive never heard this happen to any other horror film getting this treatment in Spain. Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.21.45 ( talk) 16:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
In the plot need to be edited a little better thank you ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 08:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC))
I thought it would be interesting to note in this article the connection between the fictional insurance company in the film called, "Umbrella Insurance", with the real life (and current largest insurance firm in the world) insurance company called The Travelers Company. Traveler's logo is a red UMBRELLA, and their slogan for years has been "Life under the Travelers' Umbrella". Travelers has been accused of denying 2/3 of its applicants just as the company "Umbrella Insurance" in the film was also accused of the exact same fact. Just thought this might be an interesting addition to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.8.59 ( talk) 18:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
How do we get someone to do an assessment score and grade this article? I think it's one of the best of the Saw films. Thanks. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 01:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
It seems like there's more at the Saw V#Sequel section. Does anymore else think we should redirect for now? -- H E L LØ Ŧ H E R E 22:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
The release date will be 10/23/09, not 10/30/09. Every Saw film has been released the Friday before Halloween. This incorrect date of 10/30 should be changed. - Russell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.233.138 ( talk) 04:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
...I don't think you understand how time works. Halloween is October 31st, a Saturday. Meaning Friday October 30th is the Friday before Halloween. Dragon of the Pants ( talk) 20:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
SAW VI has not yet been confirmed by LionsGate, there is reference to there being a SAW VI and also a further four more in the SAW series. But untill this is confirmed in writing, by ether LionsGate or the other participating companys. Then the page itself needs to be removed, also reference in other sections for the "Un confirmed" release of SAW VI need to be removed as well. mapadale ( talk) 08:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
i made the page with a template for "future film" however my internet connection was interrupted and i was unable to finish the page. Saw VI has had enough press release information, i believe, to warrant a page. If you will take note, the page for SAW V was created long before the release date. Also, as this is the next series in the title, i feel it appropriate that the page be made already. I will revert the page back to how it was when i left it, and continue from where i left. thankyou. Corythepaperboy ( talk) 03:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
I think you're just being rude and sarcastic by this stage. There are plenty of pages worthy of your attention; junk, etc. This page is worthy of existing; even if filming has not yet commenced. It will save time when it IS being filmed, as it will already be made. Set a date; this time next year, if nothing has been comfirmed about it being filmed or not, then delete the page. Corythepaperboy ( talk) 06:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC) I will also point out that "The winner of the VH1 reality show Scream Queens will win a role in the film" This confirms enough that there will be a SAW VI; contracts made by the Scream Queens management would not allow otherwise. Could you imagine? Hey, you MIGHT win a role in a film that MAY NOT be made. Unlikely, I'm sorry. So just let the page be. Thanks. Corythepaperboy ( talk) 06:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
CAN SOMEBODY FIX THE SUMMERY, PLEASE? LAWRENCE GORDON MAKES NO APPEARENCE IN THE FILM. THE LAST SENTENCE OF THE SUMMARY IS A LIE! LAWRENCE NEVER APPEARS AT THE LAST SECOND LAUGHING. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatkrazyguyukno ( talk • contribs) 12:38, October 24, 2009
I have made Saw VI into a full, cited, and encyclopedic article using FACTS about the CONFIRMED film. Everything is substantiated here and the one part that said something similar to "Cary Elwes MAY reappear in the film" has been put as exactly that by the source and the possibility is verifiable.
Therefore, this is a good article that has no reason to be put back to a redirect. Please discuss any thoughts if this article's worthiness here.
Thanks, GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 06:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh shit, it's been deleted !! There's no reason te remove this article. Nico92400 ( talk) 16:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone else see a reason to incorporate the fact that the Saw videogame will release in the same timeframe? Though, they are separate media forms and different plot lines. Any ideas? GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 10:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
No, not really. All the information about the videogame is contained in its own article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.99.109 ( talk) 20:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Does this article deserve a semi-protection yet ? Removing Cary Elwes in Casting section create an editing conflict. Still there's no cource for that Nico92400 ( talk) 20:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
So, Lionsgate has released the official plot synopsis, and I think for the time being, it should remain quoted, as-is, without changes or embelishment. Someone has already tried to edit it from it's original wording, and it read awkwardly and sounded unsure and even like the person was just assuming details based on the two sentences we have. It's been changed back by someone else for now. I just think that until we get more official details, it needs to stay as-is. MaximumMadnessStixon ( talk) 01:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
A lot is buzzing in the Saw community about speculation that Dr. Gordon from Saw I will return. I know that it has been prevalent in all of the movies for a Dr. Gordon appearance, but I also think that it should be noted in this article since there has been much evidence accumulated since —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.76.236 ( talk) 00:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Just so we're clear, the Sequel section doesn't really belong here. It belongs at Saw (franchise)#Future. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The Dvd Will Be Released January 19th 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.95.91.109 ( talk) 02:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC) This Was Announced In June 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejace3836 ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I reverted this article down to Start class as it does not qualify for a C class quite yet. All Saw films, I-V, are much more detailed and thorough articles and have only a Start class themselves. Until more information arises and a more clened up article is presented, it should remain Start class. Seeing as Saw is the highest grossing horror franchise in history (including inflation) and it has been recognized in popular culture endless times, it does earn a Mid importance rating. GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 01:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
There is no evidence, nor is there a source to state what the projected amount is. This information should either be removed, or a source provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samyueru ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1233227/board/nest/147322632?p=1 here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigkiller3836 ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
hey can someone tell me why you guys will post there is new posters but none of the three trailers are posted here ?
The infomation to be edited takes time. k. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 00:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)) Yeah umm the fil is planned to make 19.6 million on the 2nd day of the opening so ummm.... don;t need a source just wait... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigkiller3836 ( talk • contribs) 14:45, September 18, 2009
I read somewhere (not a forum, an actual source), that the box that Jill got contained incriminating information on Hoffman, which puts them in pursuit of him. This causes Hoffman to kidnap Erickson and put him in a trap to subside suspicion on Hoffman. Can anyone find a source for that? It may have been removed since I can't find it anymore. GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 04:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
ANSWERS & SPOILERS - BEWARE!!! That's half true. The box contains 6 tests that John wants carried out, one of which is on Hoffman, also a package that is dropped through a door mail-slot by Jill to an unknown person, the contents of which are also unknown. However, Erickson is not kidnapped, nor is he put in a trap. I won't ruin it by saying more. Benatfleshofthestars —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.146.89 ( talk • contribs) 14:27, October 24, 2009
Jon Mack's character's name is "Jane". -- OkayDock ( talk) 02:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Well from what I saw on he Wiki page her characters name is Simone. Look for your selves Tanedra Howard -- Spiderman2351 ( talk) 05:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Spiderman2351
In one week time all will be revealed. I promise you I am seeing it next Friday and I will add the pertinent details. Darrenhusted ( talk) 01:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
I discovered it is officially that her name is Simone. Jamesbanesmith ( talk) 05:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
I learned that George Newbern has joined the cast as Harold. Coincidentally, Cary Elwes ( Saw), Scott Patterson ( Saw IV, Saw V), and Newbern were all part of the DCAU: Elwes voiced Paxton Powers in Batman Beyond, Patterson voiced King Faraday in Justice League Unlimited, and Newbern voiced Superman in Justice League, Justice League Unlimited and an episode of Static Shock. Did you know that?
For those who already seen the film, what role does Harold play in this movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.46.105 ( talk) 06:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Nope, he's a guy who was denied insurance coverage by William. He is barely shown in the film, although his family plays a decent role because of him. GroundZ3R0 002 ( talk) 05:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering, does anyone know what the Runtime for this movie is? I looked on www.empiretheatres.com, and they say 120 minutes, but other sites say 90 minutes. Could someone please clarify it for me? Thanks. Queen kitten ( talk) 10:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
It's 93 minutes guy's [ [1]] Whatever you do don't put this in the main page Okay ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 00:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC))
That fine stay at 93 minutes I just needed to show this, Also Saw V is not 92 minutes it's 88. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 20:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC))
90 minutes is correct. Benatfleshofthestars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.146.89 ( talk) 14:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Can I suggest that the plot NOT be written in full until the 23rd? -- Micwa ( talk) 23:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I just went over the plot and revised some glaring errors. I added a spoiler tag too, but I'm wasn't sure how it should be formatted so I just took one I'd seen before. -- Dpsaves ( talk) 05:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
John did not know that Amanda was responsible for the loss of the baby. The letter threatened to tell him of it if she didn't kill Lynn. That part of the synopsis needs to be changed. Also, it mentions that Hoffman gets out of the reverse beartrap, but doesn't mention that the whole right side of his face is ripped off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itswhatiam ( talk • contribs) 07:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
There are still MAJOR errors in the plot summary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girlingreen23 ( talk • contribs) 13:45, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
There are some details from the first trap that aren't mentioned, like that the man and woman are coworkers at a predatory lending facility, and that the obese man is slicing off pieces of his belly fat to move his scale. Maybe someone could mention that Hoffman and the woman have an exchange in the hospital a little later, where it appears that she learned nothing from the experience after being asked by Hoffman if she learned anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwither01 ( talk • contribs) 14:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Uh is it nesscsary to put the actor's name beside the character in the plot? That's what the Cast section is for. I already changed it once... --
Micwa (
talk)
06:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
There are people posting that Dr. Gordon is in the film, Which is a big lie Please be sure if anything with Dr. Gordon in the plot is Removed. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 20:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC))
There was a section in the plot of Gordon's fate then the ending's last shot was of Gordon these Users must not to be messing with this page most of all Wikipedia it's self they can be banned. ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 01:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC))
Please, somebody, remove Dr. Gordon from the main summary of the film. It is a lie and misleading to others. Can somebody change the summary to remove Dr. Gordon from the final sentence, ending the summary at "Hoffman screaming at the rooftop"? ( Thatkrazyguyukno
I have just edited the reception again. The usual way to right reception from rotten tomatoes in to simply say that the film currently has a (%) 'Fresh/Rotten' rating based on (no. of reviews). There is no need to add 'North American and selected International critics' because depending on the country you live in, reviews are displayed differently. In America you will see American reviews first and international reviews last. In Australia its the other way around. Please leave the page as it is, it is currently the same as almost all other Rotten Tomatoes references. User talk:Benatfleshofthestars —Preceding undated comment added 01:12, October 24, 2009.
[ [2]] The Film Has Made 14.8 million and is made on $11 million view your self. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.72.98.45 ( talk) 20:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I'm seriously tired of people adding the Gordon text in. I don't care what it says on IMDb, the forums there are not reliable. Can someone settle whether or not he was in the film? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Just saw the film and he is absolutely NOT in the film. Benatfleshofthestars —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.146.89 ( talk) 14:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I Have A Source It Made 7 Million on Friday.
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/paranormal-activity-scares-up-friday-crown-saw-vi-scares-away-audiences-vampires-assistant-cant-scare-up-viewers/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.72.98.45 ( talk) 17:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Is health care so bad in Spain or why is this film only allowed in 8 theaters? Ive never heard this happen to any other horror film getting this treatment in Spain. Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.21.45 ( talk) 16:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
In the plot need to be edited a little better thank you ( Twilightnewman ( talk) 08:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC))
I thought it would be interesting to note in this article the connection between the fictional insurance company in the film called, "Umbrella Insurance", with the real life (and current largest insurance firm in the world) insurance company called The Travelers Company. Traveler's logo is a red UMBRELLA, and their slogan for years has been "Life under the Travelers' Umbrella". Travelers has been accused of denying 2/3 of its applicants just as the company "Umbrella Insurance" in the film was also accused of the exact same fact. Just thought this might be an interesting addition to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.8.59 ( talk) 18:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
How do we get someone to do an assessment score and grade this article? I think it's one of the best of the Saw films. Thanks. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 01:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)